Texas v Big Pharma Case

Re: the Legality of Marketing Vaccines based on Misleading Claims to Users


Back to All Cases

Facts of the Case

  • Dates: May 1, 2023
  • Location: Texas
  • Court: ?
  • Case #: ?
  • Plaintiff: Texas State Attorney General Paxton
  • Plaintiff’s Lawyer: Texas State Attorney General
  • Defendant: Pfizer, Moderna, Johnson & Johnson
  • Trial Type: Civil Investigative Demand
  • Judge: TBD
  • Status: Ongoing
  • Verdict: TBD

*updated May 9, 2023



In Texas on May 1st 2023 Attorney General Paxton launched an investigation into the pharmaceutical companies Pfizer, Moderna, and Johnson & Johnson concerning whether they engaged in gain-of-function research and misled the public about doing so.(1 & 5)

Paxton is also investigating whether the companies misrepresented the efficacy of their Covid-19 vaccines and the likelihood of transmitting Covid-19 after taking the vaccines in violation of the Texas Deceptive Trade Practices Act. The investigation will also look into the potential manipulation of vaccine trial data. This investigation concerns potentially fraudulent activity that falls outside the scope of legal immunity granted to manufacturers of the Covid-19 vaccine. It will also review the companies’ controversial practice of reporting the metric of “relative risk reduction” instead of “absolute risk reduction” when publicly discussing the efficacy of their vaccines. (1)

Paxton has demanded that the manufacturers Pfizer, Moderna and Johnson & Johnson answer a series of wide ranging questions concerning the development, testing, and marketing transactions / communications concerning their Covid vaccines. Each manufacturer has been sent a ten page document of questions and given until the end of May to respond. (2,3,4)

Texas’s investigation will force these companies to turn over documents the public otherwise could not access. Attorney General Paxton is committed to discovering the full scope of decision-making behind pandemic interventions forced on the public, especially when a profit motive or political pressure may have compromised Americans’ health and safety. Efforts by the federal government to coerce compliance with unjust and illegal pandemic interventions, even at the cost of citizens’ employment, means this investigation into the scientific and ethical basis on which public health decisions were made is of major significance.(1)



First State in USA to initiate a wide ranging investigation into the scientific and ethical basis behind public health measures during the ‘pandemic’.


Plaintiff’s Argument

…More information is needed…


Defendant’s Argument

…More information is needed…


Relevant Prior Judgements/ Cases

…More information is needed…





Texas State Investigation of Pfizer, Moderna & J&J -May 3 2023

source: Odysee / shortXXvids

AG Paxton Investigates Pharma -May 2 2023

source: Odysee / shortXXvids

Researcher Whistleblows on Data Integrity Issues in Pfizer’s C19 Jab Trial

source: The BMJ

FDA Claims Licensed Vaccines Do Not Need to Prevent Infections or Transmission -May 2, 2023

source: TrialSite News

Vaccine Injured Class Action Australian Government Agencies -May 3, 2023

source: TrialSite News



Attorney General, Big Pharma, Case, Clinical Trials, Consumer Protection Act, Data Manipulation, Deceptive Trade Practices, Development, DTPA, Fraud, Johnson & Johnson, Marketing, Moderna, Pfizer, Testing, Texas, Texas Deceptive Trade Practices Act, Trials, USA

Back to All Cases