Presidential Crimes Case

Presidential Crimes Case

Presidential Crimes Case

Re: the Legality for a Head of State to knowingly promise (to lie) false benefits for a new & untested medical procedure

 

Back to All Cases

Facts of the Case

  • Dates: Dec 2, 2022 (filed)
  • Location: Police station in commune of residence
  • Court: Office of the Attorney General of Switzerland
  • Case #: TBD
  • Plaintiff: Pascal Najadi
  • Plaintiff’s Lawyer:
  • Defendant: Swiss President, Alain Berset
  • Trial Type: Criminal Complaint
  • Judge: TBD
  • Status: Ongoing
  • Verdict: TBD


*updated Jan 11 2023

 

Background

On Friday 2 December, retired Swiss banker Pascal Najadi filed a complaint against the President of Switzerland Alain Berset — who is also the Head of the Department of Home Affairs and a former minister of health — at the police station in his commune of residence. [1] [2]

According to the complaint, the Office of the Attorney General of Switzerland is to start investigations against Berset. As head of the Department of Home Affairs, he was also responsible for the Federal Office of Public Health (FOPH). Berset was accused of abusing his office under Article 312 of the Swiss Criminal Code. [1] [2]

“Members of an authority or officials who abuse their official authority in order to procure an unlawful advantage for themselves or another or to inflict a disadvantage on another shall be punished with imprisonment of up to five years or a fine,” the paragraph reads. [1]

In the criminal complaint, he detailed how the health minister told Swiss television SRF on 27 October 2021 — a month before the referendum on extending the COVID certificate requirement —

“with the certificate, you can show that you are not contagious.” [1] [3]

Federal Councillor Berset then made this statement, even though his FOPH reported on the same day that ten vaccinated people had been hospitalised because of COVID. [1]

The fact that vaccinated people who fell ill at the time were not supposed to be contagious, while unvaccinated people who fell ill were for several days, was already contradictory to the state of knowledge at the time. [1]

Swiss television later added a clarification next to the transcript of the interview that it was “known that vaccinated and recovered people can also be contagious”. [1]

Alain Berset could have known better. But the Federal Councillor had taken into account neither the FOPH’s own statistics nor the statements of the US Health Authority (CDC). [1]

Even statements by Virginie Masserey, who was responsible for the fight against coronavirus at the FOPH at the time, were thrown to the wind by the magistrate. [1] [4]

“Vaccinated people can spread the coronavirus just as frequently as unvaccinated people,” Masserey stated on 3 August 2021 — three months before Berset’s controversial TV statement. [1] [4]

Masserey also stated what the federal task force had also found. Thus, Federal Councillor Berset told a lie on television a few weeks before the ballot. [1]

Either the health minister lied, or he acted with gross negligence — an act that is also prosecuted in Switzerland. The vaccination campaign has cost Swiss taxpayers at least CHF 500m. Additionally, several citizens have died as a result of the vaccine. [1]

In the reporting period from January 2021 to 22 November 2022, 6,199 “serious cases” were reported to the vaccination regulatory agency Swissmedic. This corresponds to a good 38% of all reports. [1]

The then Federal Councillor Berset contributed to a two-tier society with his false COVID vaccination certificate statement on television; such a division violates the constitution. [1]

“Accountability must also apply to Federal Councillors, not only to private persons. Fortunately, we live in a direct democracy, and we, the Swiss people, are the sovereign here,” said Najadi. [1]

Mr. Najadi, himself and his family fully jabbed and boostered, describes his realization that the entire narrative, especially regarding vaccine efficacy, is based on contradictions, misleading and unsupported claims and perhaps malicious intent. [5]

 
SwissMedic Email Exchange

After a series of email exchanges with the Swiss vaccination regulatory agency to discover the ideal mRNA injection dosage for a person of a particular body weight, to understand specifically how much spike protein the injection supposedly generates in the body to allegedly fight against covid . [5]

in their letter from Jan 6 2023, The agency confirms that the injection is intended to induce the cells to produce spike protein. They further wrote that the injection “protects the person from the virus” by teaching the immune system to create antibodies in response to the spike proteins delivered via the injection. [5]

Mr. Najadi, responds to this:  “Which we know from Pfizer is not true! The producer admits that it does not protect against the virus” [5]

SwissMedic continues to write that the production of spike protein is dependent on several factors such as immune weakness, illnesses, individual factors, etc…so we cannot tell you how much spike protein has been produced in your body. [5]

Mr. Najadi concludes from this that, “this confirms that they do not know the dosage of the mRNA to the body weight and they don’t know what happens with the spike protein reproduction triggered by the mRNA which proves that they have no clue what they are talking about.” [5]

SwissMedic ends the letter : “we would like to note that this exchange is forthwith ended- a quasi-scientific exchange like this one is overloading our resources that we need in this crisis.” [5]

 

Significance

First Corona criminal complaint to accuse a head of state of lying to the public about vaccine effectiveness

 

Plaintiff’s Argument

In essence Najadi’s argument is very simple and already covered above. It is captured in two points of fact which he can evidence:

  1. Najadi asserts that the Swiss president made false statements to the public

The elected president of Switzerland (… today responsible for the health of 8 million people) on 27th Oct 2021 went on national TV to promote the public vote for the Covid Law and the vaccination certificate. [3]

He said quote: “With the certificate, you can show that you are not contagious.” [3]

2. In August of the same year his old director of the BAG (Federal Office of Public Health) Dr Virginie Masserey stated [4]

“Vaccinated people can spread the coronavirus just as frequently as unvaccinated people,” [4]

 

Defendant’s Argument

…More information is needed…

 

Relevant Prior Judgements/ Cases

…More information is needed…

 

Decision

 

Media


UPDATE! Criminal complaint against the Swiss President-Jan 6 2023

source: Odysee / shortXXvids


P Najadi Criminal Complaint Pt. 1 -Dec 2022

source: Odysee / shortXXvids


P Najadi Criminal Complaint Pt. 2 -Dec 2022

source: Odysee / shortXXvids


German language interview with P Najadi -Jan 2 2023

source: Rumble / mwgfd


CDC Says Vax is Not Effective -Aug 19 2021

source: Odysee / shortXXvids


RPLR, CDC Reversal on Covid -Aug 15 2022

source: Odysee / shortXXvids


Pfizer Vax <1% Effective -Dec 16 2021

source: Odysee / shortXXvids


Germany Vaccination Consequences -Dec 12 2022

source: Odysee / shortXXvids


Prof Fukushima “Stop the Vax – You’re Killing People!” -Nov 29 2022

source: Odysee / shortXXvids


Science Summit Uncensored: Dutch Excess Mortality Data -Aug 15, 2022

source: Odysee / shortXXvids


EU MEP Rob Roos Pfizer Admits Jab not Tested for Transmission -Oct 11 2022

source: Odysee / shortXXvids


Biostatician Massey on Global FOIA Requests & Virus Isolation

source: Odysee / shortXXvids


US Army Doctor Whistleblower on Vaccine Deaths -Apr 13, 2022

source: Odysee / shortXXvids

 

References

  1. Swiss banker Pascal Najadi files criminal charges against new Swiss President Alain Berset
  2. ICIC Interview with Pascal Najadi: Criminal complaint against the Swiss president
  3. P Najadi Criminal Complaint Pt. 1 -Dec 2022
  4. P Najadi Criminal Complaint Pt. 2 -Dec 2022
  5. UPDATE! Criminal complaint against the Swiss President

 


 

Keyword

Article 312, Attorney General, BAG, Berset, CDC, Crime, Criminal, Criminal Code, Criminal Complaint, False, False Statements, Federal Office of Public Health, FOPH, Lies. Fraud, Masserey, Najadi, president, Swiss, Swissmedic, Switzerland


Back to All Cases

 

article-EnMarch-Abuse+Genocide

article-EnMarch-Abuse+Genocide

Article: LaREM Complaint on Abuse & Genocide

Re: the systematic poisoning & deception of the French Peoples by the governing party LaREM

 

Back to All Cases

English Translation of the francesoir.fr article (Apr 05, 2022)

On Friday, April 1, Virginie de Araujo-Recchia filed a complaint against the association La République en Marche on behalf of the citizens’ associations BonSens.org (of which Xavier Azalbert, director of the publication of FranceSoir, is an administrator) and AIMSIB (The International Association for Independent and Benevolent Scientific Medicine). The plaintiffs accuse Emmanuel Macron’s political party of “sectarian aberrations”, involving facts of “fraudulent abuse of the state of ignorance and of the situation of weakness”, as well as “complicity in poisoning and genocide”. To advance this, the associations and the lawyer rely essentially on the last two years of crisis management, in particular on the liberticidal measures, the control of information and “collective hypnosis”.

Almost ironically, this complaint comes only a few days after Me de Araujo-Recchia was released from police custody on March 24. She had been arrested by the DGSI in the context of an investigation linked to Rémy Daillet, and was finally released without being accused of “anything”. During her interrogation – the content of which she told us a few days later – questions such as

“What is the term ‘conspiracy’?”, “What is the new world order?” or “What do you think of Freemasonry?”

made it clear that she was being accused of a form of drift.

Let’s note that in January 2022, she already filed a complaint, with her colleague Jean-Pierre Joseph, against the parliamentarians who voted the law of August 5 (renewal of the health pass and vaccination obligation).

Two months and an interpellation later, she returns to the charge with this complaint against La République en Marche. BonSens, AIMSIB and Me Virginie de Araujo-Recchia share in a statement the reflection that led them to this result:


the statement:

The associations BonSens.org and International Association for Independent and Benevolent Scientific Medicine (AIMSIB) are once again joining forces in a complaint targeting the association LaREM for sectarian aberrations involving facts of fraudulent abuse of the state of ignorance and situation of weakness, complicity in poisoning and attempted poisoning, complicity in genocide.

Indeed, the five-year mandate granted to LaREM has been punctuated by protests and massive demonstrations. From yellow vest protests to weekly demonstrations in recent months, demanding an end to “Covid-19” propaganda, the restoration of law and order, and the removal of measures that infringe on civil liberties and fundamental rights proposed by LaREM leaders and adopted by the LaREM majority in the National Assembly.

Over the past two years, none of the appeals to reason from world experts, jurists, victims have been able to bend the deadly ideology of LaREM members. On the contrary, instructions have been given so that the platforms and mainstream media censor and stifle the biggest health scandal of all time.

The French people who questioned and dared to question the dogmas and ideology of the members of LaREM were incriminated, discriminated against, subjected to hate speech, censored, lost their jobs, their salaries, their family ties, their social ties, in total disregard of the highest principle of respect for human dignity.

Thus, those who do not adhere to the narrative are “impure” and outcast from society.

The signs of recognition of the followers: the health pass, the QR code, the vaccination pass, the telephone application dedicated to the tracing of the Covid-19 (Certificate of vaccination Identification), the RT-PCR test in replacement of the medical diagnosis, the triple or quadruple dose of injection of experimental genetic substance assured us of being without danger in spite of the absence of studies demonstrating it, the talismanic mask in all circumstances, in short a whole panoply put at the disposal of the transhumanist, eugenicist hyper-class, favorable to social control.

But all these tools supposed to purify or protect are of the order of belief and have absolutely no scientific basis.

Then, we witnessed an unprecedented advertising campaign by LaREM members of pharmaceutical products, for which we have no hindsight and which prove to present extremely serious risks in terms of public health, it is literally a call to collective suicide.

Every day since January 2020, we have been witnessing the establishment of fear, terror and guilt among the population, now traumatized and under collective hypnosis.

Some extracts of the book entitled “The forbidden debate – Language, COVID and totalitarianism”, by Ariane BILHERAN and Vincent PAVAN, published on March 24, 2022, taken up in the framework of this complaint, make the full demonstration of it:

“The methods used are sectarian methods: terror, sequestration, exclusion, mistreatment, loyalty conflict (forcing individuals to make impossible choices), hypnotic suggestion, censorship, persecutions. (…)

The sacrificial logic is constantly invoked, whether to demand it or to deny it: “sacrificing the spring vacations for a radiant summer”, “do we sacrifice the young on the altar of Covid-19”, “the WHO calls not to sacrifice health on the altar of economic recovery”, “the Prefect calls to sacrifice the month of March”, “April sacrificed, May freed? “, “save Christmas but sacrifice New Year’s Eve?”, “the world of culture is afraid of being sacrificed”, “respecting barrier gestures without sacrificing your hands”. Is it not the spirit of sacrifice that is also evoked by the authorities in relation to the Foreign Legion: “Nothing is obtained if nothing is sacrificed”? Why do we constantly demand that the people consent to sacrifices?

The guide of the good citizen is specified: he is the one who must sacrifice himself. Clearly, the individual exists in this discourse only to be sacrificed: he or she must demonstrate “good behavior in the face of the virus”, obedience is demanded of him or her – “be tested at the first symptoms”. Acceptance of all these constraints is considered civic-mindedness, while blind faith in the word of the president is demanded. We must assume that what the government says is TRUE, that we must trust it, “isolate ourselves at the first symptom”. Then the message is clear: the punishment for being positive (without necessarily being sick) is social exclusion – getting out of the group. Therefore, insecurity, imbalance and irresponsibility prevail in this discourse, where the axis of good is presented as the doxa of power. We understand that protection is repression! Protection is achieved through the repression of decrees. The individual is once again absorbed into the fusion with the leader: “we have all consented”; opposition and plural opinion no longer exist, everyone is supposed to have “consented.

The stigmatization of religious events can indeed be understood as a kind of competitive effect to the new world religion of the pandemic, “covidism”, with its rituals.

A cult requires adherence to a religious type of faith. The individual is not asked to analyze, but to believe blindly. Persecution and censorship, as well as intimidation, have fallen upon those who wanted to analyze, not believe.

A sect or a cult always promises the return of a lost paradise. It is the same with the totalitarian system. A sect proposes fetish objects, here the Holy Grail was the injection, supposed to free us from evil.

The totalitarian drift is sectarian and prophetic in nature. “The scientificity of totalitarian propaganda is characterized by the emphasis it places almost exclusively on scientific prophecy, as opposed to the more traditional reference to the past,” said Hannah Arendt.

The collective delusional certainty, of a paranoid type, was based on erroneous first principles, then a construction of the discourse orchestrated on faith, without accepting the slightest doubt. This faith was organized, from the beginning, on three sophisms, not revealed but present in the ideological background of the speeches and the political decisions, and that we will expose as follows:

1. The epidemic justifies a dictatorship.

2. Only a vaccine can stop the epidemic.

3. A vaccine is the only way to save humanity from the great danger that threatens it. (…)

The citizens acquire little by little the habit of having to be authorized for their slightest acts and gestures, a harmful conditioning if there is one, coupled with their infantilization: they are judged irresponsible, underestimated or insulted by the power, which shows a cynical political class and particularly cut off from realities.

It is not science, and even less medicine, but a discourse with religious overtones, with its litanies, and its daily mortifying counting, reducing the complexity of reality to a single reading prism. The construction of a new language, with its new words and expressions, totally disconnected from the reality of experience, is more a matter of sectarian and religious belief – thus of faith in the mass said by the media and politics – than of science.”

Therefore, by propagating chaos, LaREM disturbs public order and only justice is now able to put an end to its sectarian aberrations.

In France, in fact, it is not the sect itself that leads to legal proceedings, but rather the sectarian aberrations that fall under the notion of public order.

In French administrative law, public order is the ideal social state characterized by “good order, security, public health and tranquility”, public morality and the dignity of the human person.

French criminal law grants everyone the right to hold the religious, philosophical or moral convictions of their choice, however, it does not admit that, in their externalization, they come into conflict with the requirements of public order.

The imperatives of public morality and public health in particular are not abstract concepts that might be thought to be concerned solely with the satisfaction of society’s needs.

Their primary function is human: their purpose is to ensure respect for the individual’s right to life, to the protection of his physical integrity and health, to psychological balance, to the full development of his physical and intellectual capacities. In short, to the dignity of the person. These values can be seriously undermined by actions or attitudes dictated by exaggerated beliefs or convictions.

If the imperative of neutrality in a secular and democratic State invites us not to stigmatize the extravagance of certain religious, philosophical or moral practices, it cannot lead us to tolerate their excesses. Thus, when public order appears to be threatened, criminal law immediately expresses its hostility by the implementation of multiple incriminations, generally falling under “common” criminal law (Law n° 2001-504 of June 12, 2001, aimed at reinforcing the prevention and repression of sectarian movements which undermine human rights and fundamental freedoms, known as the About-Picard law).

A set of indicators makes it possible to characterize the existence of a risk of sectarian aberration:

  • mental destabilization,
  • a break with the original environment,
  • the existence of attacks on physical integrity,
  • the recruitment of children,
  • anti-social discourse,
  • disturbance of the public order
  • the importance of legal problems,
  • the possible detour of traditional economic circuits,
  • attempts to infiltrate the public authorities.

It is a deviation from the freedom of thought, opinion or religion that undermines fundamental rights, the security or integrity of individuals, public order, laws or regulations.

It is characterized by the implementation, by an organized group or by an isolated individual, whatever its nature or activity, of pressures or techniques aiming at creating, maintaining or exploiting in a person a state of psychological or physical subjection, depriving him/her of a part of his/her free will, with harmful consequences for this person, his/her entourage or for society.

It does not matter whether such a drift is committed by a sect, a new religious movement, a religion of the Book or by a health charlatan. As soon as a certain number of criteria are met, the first of which is subjection, the repressive action of the State is intended to be implemented (Miviludes site).

The action of the judge, the guardian of freedom, goes in the direction of protection against any physical or psychological subjection.

The plaintiff associations therefore believe that it is now up to the judge to examine the actions of the LaREM association and to evaluate their consequences on public order.

See original article in French here

related articles

Grand Jury – Court of Public Opinion

 


Keywords

Abuse of Power, AIMSIB, Arendt, article, Association Internationale pour une Médecine Scientifique Indépendante et Bienveillante, Bilheran, BonSens, Censorship, collective, complaint, conditioning, Consent, Crime, cult, de Araujo Recchia, DGSI, En Marche, Fear, France, Fraud, freedom, Fundamental, Genocide, guilt, Human, human dignity, hypnosis, individual, infantilization, intimidation, Jean-Pierre Joseph, La République en Marche, LaREM, Macron, New World Order, opinion, Pavan, Persecution, poisoning, religion, Rémy Daillet, Rights, sacrifice, terror, Thought, Totalitarianism, trauma, Vaccination, Vaccine, Virginie


Back to All Cases