Presidential Crimes Case

Presidential Crimes Case

Presidential Crimes Case

Re: the Legality for a Head of State to knowingly promise (to lie) false benefits for a new & untested medical procedure

 

Back to All Cases

Facts of the Case

  • Dates: Dec 2, 2022 (filed)
  • Location: Police station in commune of residence
  • Court: Office of the Attorney General of Switzerland
  • Case #: TBD
  • Plaintiff: Pascal Najadi
  • Plaintiff’s Lawyer:
  • Defendant: Swiss President, Alain Berset
  • Trial Type: Criminal Complaint
  • Judge: TBD
  • Status: Dismissed
  • Verdict: Dismissed


*updated May 10, 2023

 

Background

On Friday 2 December, retired Swiss banker Pascal Najadi filed a complaint against the President of Switzerland Alain Berset — who is also the Head of the Department of Home Affairs and a former minister of health — at the police station in his commune of residence. [1] [2]

According to the complaint, the Office of the Attorney General of Switzerland is to start investigations against Berset. As head of the Department of Home Affairs, he was also responsible for the Federal Office of Public Health (FOPH). Berset was accused of abusing his office under Article 312 of the Swiss Criminal Code. [1] [2]

“Members of an authority or officials who abuse their official authority in order to procure an unlawful advantage for themselves or another or to inflict a disadvantage on another shall be punished with imprisonment of up to five years or a fine,” the paragraph reads. [1]

In the criminal complaint, he detailed how the health minister told Swiss television SRF on 27 October 2021 — a month before the referendum on extending the COVID certificate requirement —

“with the certificate, you can show that you are not contagious.” [1] [3]

Federal Councillor Berset then made this statement, even though his FOPH reported on the same day that ten vaccinated people had been hospitalised because of COVID. [1]

The fact that vaccinated people who fell ill at the time were not supposed to be contagious, while unvaccinated people who fell ill were for several days, was already contradictory to the state of knowledge at the time. [1]

Swiss television later added a clarification next to the transcript of the interview that it was “known that vaccinated and recovered people can also be contagious”. [1]

Alain Berset could have known better. But the Federal Councillor had taken into account neither the FOPH’s own statistics nor the statements of the US Health Authority (CDC). [1]

Even statements by Virginie Masserey, who was responsible for the fight against coronavirus at the FOPH at the time, were thrown to the wind by the magistrate. [1] [4]

“Vaccinated people can spread the coronavirus just as frequently as unvaccinated people,” Masserey stated on 3 August 2021 — three months before Berset’s controversial TV statement. [1] [4]

Masserey also stated what the federal task force had also found. Thus, Federal Councillor Berset told a lie on television a few weeks before the ballot. [1]

Either the health minister lied, or he acted with gross negligence — an act that is also prosecuted in Switzerland. The vaccination campaign has cost Swiss taxpayers at least CHF 500m. Additionally, several citizens have died as a result of the vaccine. [1]

In the reporting period from January 2021 to 22 November 2022, 6,199 “serious cases” were reported to the vaccination regulatory agency Swissmedic. This corresponds to a good 38% of all reports. [1]

The then Federal Councillor Berset contributed to a two-tier society with his false COVID vaccination certificate statement on television; such a division violates the constitution. [1]

“Accountability must also apply to Federal Councillors, not only to private persons. Fortunately, we live in a direct democracy, and we, the Swiss people, are the sovereign here,” said Najadi. [1]

Mr. Najadi, himself and his family fully jabbed and boostered, describes his realization that the entire narrative, especially regarding vaccine efficacy, is based on contradictions, misleading and unsupported claims and perhaps malicious intent. [5]

 
SwissMedic Email Exchange

After a series of email exchanges with the Swiss vaccination regulatory agency to discover the ideal mRNA injection dosage for a person of a particular body weight, to understand specifically how much spike protein the injection supposedly generates in the body to allegedly fight against covid . [5]

in their letter from Jan 6 2023, The agency confirms that the injection is intended to induce the cells to produce spike protein. They further wrote that the injection “protects the person from the virus” by teaching the immune system to create antibodies in response to the spike proteins delivered via the injection. [5]

Mr. Najadi, responds to this:  “Which we know from Pfizer is not true! The producer admits that it does not protect against the virus” [5]

SwissMedic continues to write that the production of spike protein is dependent on several factors such as immune weakness, illnesses, individual factors, etc…so we cannot tell you how much spike protein has been produced in your body. [5]

Mr. Najadi concludes from this that, “this confirms that they do not know the dosage of the mRNA to the body weight and they don’t know what happens with the spike protein reproduction triggered by the mRNA which proves that they have no clue what they are talking about.” [5]

SwissMedic ends the letter : “we would like to note that this exchange is forthwith ended- a quasi-scientific exchange like this one is overloading our resources that we need in this crisis.” [5]

 

Significance

First Corona criminal complaint to accuse a head of state of lying to the public about vaccine effectiveness

 

Plaintiff’s Argument

In essence Najadi’s argument is very simple and already covered above. It is captured in two points of fact which he can evidence:

  1. Najadi asserts that the Swiss president made false statements to the public

The elected president of Switzerland (… today responsible for the health of 8 million people) on 27th Oct 2021 went on national TV to promote the public vote for the Covid Law and the vaccination certificate. [3]

He said quote: “With the certificate, you can show that you are not contagious.” [3]

2. In August of the same year his old director of the BAG (Federal Office of Public Health) Dr Virginie Masserey stated [4]

“Vaccinated people can spread the coronavirus just as frequently as unvaccinated people,” [4]

 

Defendant’s Argument

…More information is needed…

 

Relevant Prior Judgements/ Cases

…More information is needed…

 

Decision

 

Media


Prof. Dr. Bhakdi Supports Najadi Complaint -Jan 29 2023

source: Rumble / neutralswiss


UPDATE! Criminal complaint against the Swiss President-Jan 6 2023

source: Odysee / shortXXvids


P Najadi Criminal Complaint Pt. 1 -Dec 2022

source: Odysee / shortXXvids


P Najadi Criminal Complaint Pt. 2 -Dec 2022

source: Odysee / shortXXvids


German language interview with P Najadi -Jan 2 2023

source: Rumble / mwgfd


CDC Says Vax is Not Effective -Aug 19 2021

source: Odysee / shortXXvids


RPLR, CDC Reversal on Covid -Aug 15 2022

source: Odysee / shortXXvids


Pfizer Vax <1% Effective -Dec 16 2021

source: Odysee / shortXXvids


Germany Vaccination Consequences -Dec 12 2022

source: Odysee / shortXXvids


Prof Fukushima “Stop the Vax – You’re Killing People!” -Nov 29 2022

source: Odysee / shortXXvids


Science Summit Uncensored: Dutch Excess Mortality Data -Aug 15, 2022

source: Odysee / shortXXvids


EU MEP Rob Roos Pfizer Admits Jab not Tested for Transmission -Oct 11 2022

source: Odysee / shortXXvids


Biostatician Massey on Global FOIA Requests & Virus Isolation

source: Odysee / shortXXvids


US Army Doctor Whistleblower on Vaccine Deaths -Apr 13, 2022

source: Odysee / shortXXvids

 

References

  1. Swiss banker Pascal Najadi files criminal charges against new Swiss President Alain Berset
  2. ICIC Interview with Pascal Najadi: Criminal complaint against the Swiss president
  3. P Najadi Criminal Complaint Pt. 1 -Dec 2022
  4. P Najadi Criminal Complaint Pt. 2 -Dec 2022
  5. UPDATE! Criminal complaint against the Swiss President
  6. BREAKING NEWS – Live from Switzerland with Pascal Najadi

 


 

Keyword

Article 312, Attorney General, BAG, Berset, CDC, Crime, Criminal, Criminal Code, Criminal Complaint, False, False Statements, Federal Office of Public Health, FOPH, Lies. Fraud, Masserey, Najadi, president, Swiss, Swissmedic, Switzerland


Back to All Cases

 

Arrest-Bruchet

Arrest-Bruchet

Arrest: Dr. Bruchet

Re: the persecution of a Doctor who dared to exercise his Right to Free Speech & Resistance to challenge the government position on the safety & effectiveness of Covid Vaccines

 

Back to All Cases

In December 2021, Canadian Doctor Bruchet was sentenced to a Psych ward for 25 days

On December 8, Dr. Bruchet had an argument with a tenant over loud music in his apartment building (a relatively common occurrence). It is unclear whether the tenant reported him as a candidate for the mental health act or someone else. Suddenly, three RCMP squad cars and six RCMP officers descended on Dr. Bruchet and hauled him off in handcuffs for a “psych evaluation.”

The question remains: was Dr. Bruchet unlawfully detained because he exposed the connection of stillbirths to the Covid vaccines? Or because he argued with his tenant over loud music? Or was Dr. Bruchet’s age a convenient excuse? “Dr. Mel,” as he is affectionately known, practiced medicine for many years in British Columbia.


Dr Bruchet Discusses his Detention, Open Warrant & more

source: odysee\longXXvids


 

Keywords

Arrest, British Columbia, Bruchet, Canada, constitution, Doctor, evidence, Fake, False, free speech, frontal lobe dementia, Hope Center, Hospital, Judicial Notice, Lions Gate, mania, Melvin, Misinformation, Nagase, News, opinion, Pregnant, Psych ward, Psychiatric, RCMP, Right to Resist, side effects, Stillbirths, unlawful, Vaccine, Vancouver, Women


Back to All Cases

 

Fake Jab Pass Case

Fake Jab Pass Case

Fake Jab Pass Case

Re: the Legality of a Medical Doctor Certifying a Person as “Vaccinated” when they are not, in order to spare them the Dangers of Injury or Death from a Mandated Untested Toxic Injection.

 

Back to All Cases

Facts of the Case

  • Dates: June 2023
  • Location: Germany
  • Court: Regional Court of Bochum
  • Case #:
  • Plaintiff: State prosecutor Tophoff
  • Defendant’s Lawyer: Wilfried Schmitz
  • Defendant: Dr. Heinrich Habig, Fatima Habig
  • Trial Type: Criminal Complaint
  • Judge: Petra Breywisch-Lepping
  • Status: Ongoing – Under Appeal
  • Verdict: Guilty (partial verdict)


*updated July 10, 2023

 

Background

Dr. Heinrich Habig is a 67 year-old medical doctor with his own practice who, in dealing with patients wishing to avoid taking the Covid-19 injections for valid safety concerns, yet needing to participate in society for work or family needs, issued vaccination certificates without actually injecting his patients. (1)

Dr. Habig was reported to the police by another doctor, observed by the police for a period following which his practice was raided on 21st January 2022 and records removed. (1)

Another sad climax in the case occurred on 14 May 2022 when police officers picked up Heinrich Habig from the flat of an acquaintance and took him to the Bochum correctional institution (JVA). The 67-year-old doctor has now been in pre-trial detention there under strict security measures for over a year. Charges were only brought on 12 November 2022. The trial began in January 2023. (1)

 
Difficult prison conditions

Dr. Habig’s wife, Fatima Habig [who is a co-defendant, having been accused of aiding and abetting her husband] was only allowed to visit her husband twice a month under supervision for about one hour. In addition to the presence of a prison officer, the prosecutor Tophoff requested the presence of a woman who listens in on the Habig couple’s conversations – pure harassment, according to lawyer Wilfried Schmitz. During one of these visits, the couple talked about past holidays, which led the prosecution to assume that there was an “increased risk of absconding”. (3)

Due to the allegedly increased risk of escape, the 67-year-old accused was even transported to court in hand and foot cuffs, which were removed from him only shortly before he entered the courtroom. After the trial days, the doctor often had to wait for hours in the cold court cellar, also with hand and foot cuffs on, until he was brought back to the prison. Only when lawyer Schmitz for Heinrich Habig and lawyer Stefan Schlüter for Fatima Habig were called in as elective defence lawyers in February did they ensure that the shackles were removed. (3)

The two grandchildren (eight and ten years old) have only been allowed to visit their grandfather once in prison. Before his pre-trial detention, they were with their grandparents every day. Another human low point occurred on Heinrich Habig’s birthday, which was also the day of the trial: Fatima Habig took two steps towards her husband at the end of the trial day to congratulate him, which promptly led to frantic shouts from the judge for the prison officers, who then prevented the couple from hugging briefly. (3)

A partial verdict was delivered by the judge in the week of June 26th 2023. (2)

An appeal against the verdict is possible.

 

Significance

First doctor in Germany to be given a severe jail sentence for issuing false vaccination certificates.

 

Plaintiff’s Argument

As trial observers report, the prosecutor actually stated in her plea that there were no cases of severe side effects of vaccination. Such claims were “contrarian ideology”. (2)

 

Defendant’s Argument

In his defence, Dr. Habig invoked his oath to the medical association. According to their professional code of conduct, he was forbidden to follow instructions which, in his eyes, were against his ethos and humanity. This was exactly the situation when people were forced to be “vaccinated”. (2)

 

Relevant Prior Judgements/ Cases

…More information is needed…

 

Decision

Medical doctor, Heinrich Habig was sentenced to two years and ten months in prison for issuing vaccination certificates in 207 cases without vaccinating his patients. (2)

The trial for more than 400 other possible “fake vaccinations” will be continued in a month. If the doctor is also convicted in these cases, he could face up to five years in prison. Probably purely by chance, the law on “issuing false health certificates” was tightened in November 2021. (2)

 

Aftermath

Transition News wrote

Last week, German justice reached its nadir … This trial is not about justice, but only about making a political example to force people to obey, according to the motto: “Punish one, educate a hundred.”

Process observer and lawyer Chris Moser commented

that “The reasoning of the judgement leaves a lot to be desired … Only allegations were made, not a single subsumption. According to the court, there are no grounds for justification or excuse. Instead, the court accuses Heinrich Habig of having a ‘hostile attitude towards the law’. (4)(5)

 

Media


Speech in support of Dr. Habig outside Bochum detention Centre -Feb 18, 2023

source: YouTube


Miriam Hope on Dr Heinrich Habig Trial Verdict -Jun 29 2023

source: Odysee / longXXvids


12 yr old Pfizer Vaccine Trial Victim, Maddie -July 2021

source: UK Column News


Prof Perronne WHO Vaccine Expert -Jan 12 2022

source: Rumble Doctors for Covid Ethics


CDC Says Vax is Not Effective -Aug 19 2021

source: Odysee / shortXXvids

 

References

  1. paulbrandenburg.com/bericht/patienten-vor-falscher-impfung-bewahrt-arzt-seit-ueber-einem-jahr-in-u-haft/
  2. English Translation of Corona Transition Article -July 2 2023
  3. paulbrandenburg.com/bericht/patienten-vor-falscher-impfung-bewahrt-arzt-seit-ueber-einem-jahr-in-u-haft/
  4. reitschuster.de/post/skandal-urteil-fast-drei-jahre-jahre-haft-fuer-nicht-impfarzt/
  5. ChrisMoser/398 (telegram)

 

Keyword

Censorship, Code of Conduct, Coercion, Covid Health Pass, Fake Pass, False, First Do No Harm, Free Speech, Germany, Green Pass, Habig, Hippocratic Oath, Imprisonment, Justice, Microbiology, Passes, Passport, Persecution, Rights, Truth, Vaccination Certificates 


Back to All Cases