PDF-BonSensComplaint

PDF-BonSensComplaint

Criminal Complaint: Abuse of Power

Re: the Legality of Representatives of the People to represent Private Interests against the interest of the People they are sworn to protect & represent that has led to the forced medical experimentation of the people against their will, along with other removal of inalienable Liberties

 

Back to All Cases

This is a Criminal Complaint holding members of the French Parliament responsible for deaths & damages caused by the Covid Measures & Medical Treatments – Jan 17 2022


Click the “View Fullscreen” button below to get full functionality in fullscreen.


Back to All Cases

MPs Abuse of Power Case

MPs Abuse of Power Case

MPs Abuse of Power Case

Re: the Legality of Representatives of the People to represent Private Interests against the interest of the People they are sworn to protect & represent that has led to the forced medical experimentation of the people against their will, along with other removal of inalienable Liberties

 

Back to All Cases

Facts of the Case

  • Dates: January 17, 2022
  • Location: Paris, France
  • Court: Judicial Tribunal of Paris
  • Case #: (in process of obtaining)
  • Plaintiff: Association BonSens.org, the International Association for Independent & Benevolent Scientific Medicine (AIMSIB), the Collective of Resistant Mayors (CDMR), Collective of European Trade Unions and Professional Associations (CSAPE), Mr. Antoine MARTINEZ, General (2s) Air Force & the Freedom Health Union (SLS)
  • Plaintiff’s Lawyer: Me de Araujo-Recchia
  • Defendant: Senators, Deputies, Members of the Joint Parliamentary Committee (CMP)
  • Trial Type: Criminal Complaint
  • Judge: Senior Investigating Judge of the Judicial Tribunal of Paris
  • Status: Ongoing
  • Verdict: TBD


 

Background

Complaint before the Senior Investigating Judge of the Judicial Tribunal of Paris on behalf of the Association BonSens.org, the International Association for Independent and Benevolent Scientific Medicine (AIMSIB), the Collective of Resistant Mayors (CDMR), Collective of European Trade Unions and Professional Associations (CSAPE), Mr. Antoine MARTINEZ, General (2s) Air Force and the Freedom Health Union (SLS), against the parliamentarians who validated the law of 5 August relating to the management of health crises. [1]

This law aimed to force millions of professionals to undergo experimental gene therapy or risk losing their jobs. The plaintiff associations were informed that the parliamentarians of the Joint Committee (CMP) reached an agreement outside the framework of the CMP for the benefit of private interests in return for their vote for a bill that violates the French Constitution, international law and the rules of both Chambers that parliamentarians are bound to respect. [1]

the Complaint explains:

BonSens.org and AIMSIB have written numerous articles in order to alert the public authorities to the dangers linked to experimental genetically modified substances marketed by Pfizer, Moderna, AstraZeneca and Johnson & Johnson. The BonSens.org association has warned by all means (i.e. articles, open letters, registered letters) the members of parliament, and therefore in particular the members of parliament who are the main defendants, of the erroneous information they had concerning these pharmaceutical products.

The association BonSens.org and the AIMSIB have repeatedly warned that these products endangered the lives of others, involved serious risks of physical and psychological harm, and that these products were likely to lead to the death of thousands of citizens in the short and medium term. The letters were accompanied by factual evidence and international studies with a high level of scientific evidence.

In an interview the Plaintiff’s Lawyer Me de Araujo-Recchia elaborates:

It was a question of renewing the health pass (disguised vaccination obligation) and deciding on the vaccination obligation of many professionals (health professionals, firemen, soldiers among others).

In this way, the parliamentarians in question have condemned millions of French people to choose between their job/social life and their health. Indeed, it is not a question of submitting to a compulsory vaccination with a safe product for which there is ten years of hindsight and which is intended to protect against a fatal disease with no available treatment.

It is actually about forcing millions of French people to undergo a clinical trial of biological drugs (i.e. gene therapies that fall into the category of biological drugs under EU law), which had an impressive list of side effects even before they were put on the market.

 

The report of the Federal Drug Administration (FDA) of October 2020 shows this very well: there was already talk of myocarditis, Guillain-Barré syndrome, Creutzfeldt-Jakob disease etc.

These pharmaceutical products are the subject of millions of adverse reaction reports:
– 2,880,653 records reported on the WHO VigiAcces database,
19,387 deaths as of 18 December 2021 and 1,275,634 adverse reactions, 363,774 of which are serious, on the European pharmacovigilance website EudraVigilance.

These data are extremely alarming compared to the data from all conventional vaccination campaigns combined, bearing in mind that in the field of pharmacovigilance, reports actually concern 1-10% of actual effects according to internal studies by Health Human Services and Harvard).

 

Medical Rights

point 5 of the Nuremberg Code:

” 5. The experiment must not be attempted when there is a priori reason to believe that it will result in the death or disability of the subject.”

The International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights echoed this prohibition against involuntary experimentation in its 1966 text, which states: no one shall be subjected without his free consent to medical or scientific experimentation.” This prohibition is now so universally recognised that some courts and scholars have considered this right to informed consent as a matter of customary international law. (….). “

It is also important to note that France is a signatory to the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights and the OVIEDO Convention and that these texts are binding.

 

Human Rights

Citizens are holders of rights, they make society, pay taxes and social charges and respect the laws.

If we only have duties, and freedoms are taken away, then this is modern slavery and totalitarianism.

Moreover, according to Article 16 of the Declaration of the Rights of Man and of the Citizen of 1789:

“Any society in which the guarantee of rights is not assured, nor the separation of powers determined, has no constitution.”

 

Significance

In this case, the plaintiffs believe that the actions of the accused parliamentarians made them accomplices in poisoning and crimes against humanity. They participate in a criminal association. [1]

 

Plaintiff’s Argument

…More information is needed…

 

Defendant’s Argument

…More information is needed…

 

Relevant Prior Judgements/ Cases

In the PAPON case, the Council of State considered that the faults of this public agent were committed within the framework of his service, that they are not deprived of any link with the latter.

However, because of their “particular seriousness”, they have the character of an inexcusable personal fault, which makes them detachable from the functions performed.

Consequently, Mr Maurice Papon is found guilty of complicity in a crime against humanity.

The criminal liability of an accomplice to crimes against humanity only requires, from a moral point of view, proof of the intention to commit the common law crimes that serve as a basis for crimes against humanity.

 

Decision

 

Media

de Araujo Recchia Interview

source: Tristan Edelman

Corona Ausschuss 78

source: Corona-Ausschuss

Pandemic in France

source: MikeNadi

Me de Araujo-Recchia: Génocide

source: Me de Araujo-Recchia

 

References

  1. Contribution from the Plaintiff’s Lawyer Me de Araujo-Recchia
  2. French Lawyer Files Complaint Against MPs Who Voted for Mandatory Injection of Workers

 

Keyword

binding international law, Conflicts of Interest, crime against humanity, FDA, France, French Constitution, gene therapy, human rights related to vaccination, immunity, informed consent, Mary Holland, Mc Cullough, MPs, Nuremberg Code, Oviedo Convention, Papon Case, Parliamentarians, rules of chambers, senior investigation judge, separation of powers, side effects


Back to All Cases

 

VaccineFearCase

VaccineFearCase

Vaccine Fear Criminal Complaint

Re: the Legality of the Media & Politicians to lie to & manipulate the public about the safety & efficacy of the Covid Vaccine

 

Back to All Cases

Facts of the Case

  • Dates: Nov 4, 2021
  • Location: Paris, France
  • Court: Judicial Court of Paris
  • Case #: ??
  • Plaintiff: The Association BonSens.org & The Association Internationale pour une Médecine Scientifique Indépendante et Bienveillante (AIMSIB) & Mr _.
  • Defendant: ??
  • Trial Type: Criminal Complaint
  • Judge(s): Madam/Mister the Doyen of the Investigating Judges of the Judicial Court of PARIS
  • Expert: Dr Ariane Bilharen
  • Status: Ongoing: Currently (12-17-21) before the Office of the Senior Investigating Judge, which may wish to open an investigation into the above-mentioned facts.
  • Verdict: TBD


 

Background

Focus of this complaint is on what was the role of media broadcasting of either suppressing access to treatments, or incentivizing an individual to do something that would be against her/his interest?

The lawsuit is extensive at 100+ pages with 600+ pages of Annex. The work that has been done with a group of scientists is to bring as many facts as possible forward into categories such as:

  • Are early treatments effective?
  • Is vaccination effective?
  • Are side effects present or not?
  • What is the psychological impact of the repetition of a message?
  • Are all of the parties that have played a role in this lawsuit totally independent? and have no link to the pharmaceutical industry nor any conflict of interest?

Complainants are by an individual who wishes to remain anonymous, by the Association BonSens.info and by the Association Internationale pour une Médecine Scientifique Indépendante et Bienveillante (AIMSIB).

 

Significance

This Criminal complaint is significant for its use of Expert testimony.  The Criminal complaint based in part on analysis by clinical psychologist and doctor in psychopathology, Dr Ariane Bilharen.

Author of more than twenty-five books, her areas of expertise are the psychology of power and its deviances (manipulation, harassment, authority, resumption of personal power), analyzing totalitarianism from the angle of paranoïa with a double glaze of philosopher and psychologist.

see also:

 

Plaintiff’s Argument

For the charges :

  • FRAUDULENT ABUSE of ignorance and weakness (article 223-15-2 of the criminal code)
  • Complicity in EXTORTION and attempted extortion (articles 312-1 and 312-9 of the criminal code)
  • Complicity in POISONING and attempted poisoning (article 221-5 of the criminal code)

 

Defendant’s Argument

…More information is needed…

 

Relevant Prior Judgements/ Cases

…More information is needed…

 

Decision

…More information is needed…

 

Aftermath

…More information is needed…

 


Further Research

Court Documents:
In the news:

 

Media

……

source: ….

….

source: ….

 

References

  1. Summary of Documents in Support of The Complaint
  2.  

 

Keyword

Conflicts of Interest, Psychology, Coercion, Collusion, Media, Fear, Agenda, Mongering,  False Information, GAFAM (corresponds to the big 5: Google Apple Facebook Amazon Microsoft), Censorship, Informed Consent, 1946 French Constitution, Article 11 of Declaration of the Rights of Man and of the Citizen 26 August 1789, Article 10 of Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms 4 November 1950, Albert Biderman Charter of Coercion, Mass Manipulation, Social Chaos, Hypnotic Trance, Political-Media Dyad, Dr Ariane Bilheran, Perversion, Paranoia, Delusion, Stanley Milgram, Covert Psychological Strategies,  France


Back to All Cases