Arrest: Dr. Bruchet

Re: the persecution of a Doctor who dared to exercise his Right to Free Speech & Resistance to challenge the government position on the safety & effectiveness of Covid Vaccines


Back to All Cases

In December 2021, Canadian Doctor Bruchet was sentenced to a Psych ward for 25 days

On December 8, Dr. Bruchet had an argument with a tenant over loud music in his apartment building (a relatively common occurrence). It is unclear whether the tenant reported him as a candidate for the mental health act or someone else. Suddenly, three RCMP squad cars and six RCMP officers descended on Dr. Bruchet and hauled him off in handcuffs for a “psych evaluation.”

The question remains: was Dr. Bruchet unlawfully detained because he exposed the connection of stillbirths to the Covid vaccines? Or because he argued with his tenant over loud music? Or was Dr. Bruchet’s age a convenient excuse? “Dr. Mel,” as he is affectionately known, practiced medicine for many years in British Columbia.

Dr Bruchet Discusses his Detention, Open Warrant & more

source: odysee\longXXvids



Arrest, British Columbia, Bruchet, Canada, constitution, Doctor, evidence, Fake, False, free speech, frontal lobe dementia, Hope Center, Hospital, Judicial Notice, Lions Gate, mania, Melvin, Misinformation, Nagase, News, opinion, Pregnant, Psych ward, Psychiatric, RCMP, Right to Resist, side effects, Stillbirths, unlawful, Vaccine, Vancouver, Women

Back to All Cases


Houston Methodist Hospital Case

Houston Methodist Hospital Case

Houston Methodist Hospital Case

Re: Legality of Employer Vaccine Mandates


Back to All Cases

Facts of the Case

  • Dates: June 12 2021
  • Location: Houston Texas
  • Court: US District Court
  • Case #: Civil Action H-21-1774
  • Plaintiff: Jennifer Bridges & Hospital Emloyees
  • Defendant: Houston Methodist Hospital
  • Trial Type: Class Action
  • Judge: Lynn Hughes
  • Status: Completed
  • Verdict: for the Defendant



117 employees of Houston Methodist Hospital challenged their employer’s demand that all staff should be vaccinated or be terminated by June 7 2021.



The Hospital is the first Business in the US to make this demand. As of the time of this trial the 3 vaccines currently in use from Moderna, Pfizer and Johnson & Johnson, have only emergency approval and have not yet been approved by the FDA.

According the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention’s (CDC) Vaccine Adverse Events Reporting System the Data released Friday (June 11 2021) showed 262,521 reports of adverse events following COVID vaccines, including 4,406 deaths and 21,537 serious injuries between Dec. 14, 2020 and May 21, 2021. -3


Plaintiff’s Argument

  • Jennifer Bridges the main plaintiff argued that the vaccine was still experimental, that more testing was needed and that therefore she did not feel comfortable taking it. She further said that she did not want to be a “guinea pig”

  • Jared Woodfill, the Attorney for the plaintiffs said the Hospital mandate “is a severe and blatant violation of the Nuremberg Code and the public policy of the state of Texas.” -3 The Nuremberg Code was created in 1947 in response to the forced medical experimentation of the Nazi regime against concentration camp prisoners” -3

  • Dr Peter McCullough in an interview with the Corona-Ausschuss stated that he will be a scientific witness for the doctors and staff who oppose the forced vaccinations -4


Defendant’s Argument

Dr. Marc Boom, the hospital’s CEO said that the flu vaccine has been a requirement for employees since 2009, making their covid vaccination demand legal. Further more the Hospital deemed the vaccine proven safe.

“The COVID-19 vaccines have proven through rigorous trials to be very safe and very effective and are not experimental. More than 165 million people in the U.S. alone have received vaccines against COVID-19, and this has resulted in the lowest numbers of infections in our country and in the Houston region in more than a year,” he said. “As health care workers, it is our sacred obligation to do whatever we can to protect our patients, who are the most vulnerable in our community. It is our duty and our privilege.”-1



Recently, the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC) also altered their rules to allow for mandated covid vaccinations by employers. this was not the case previously for emergency use drugs which the vaccine still is (at the time of this case).

“The new rules suggest employers could require their staffers physically entering the workplace to be vaccinated for COVID so long as they make accommodations for an employee’s disability and religious beliefs. However, those employees who don’t get vaccinated must wear a mask, socially distance or change their schedules.” -3



  • Judge Hughes, a Reagan appointee, ruled in favor of the hospital, rejecting the comparison to Nazi Germany as well as the notion that the vaccine was still “experimental”

    “Equating the injection requirement to medical experimentation in concentration camps is reprehensible,” … “Nazi doctors conducted medical experiments on victims that caused pain, mutilation, permanent disability, and in many cases, death. -2



  • The Plaintiff’s attorney Jared Woodfill, speaking to the The Washington Times said that he will appeal the ruling and “that the lawsuit is one battle in a larger war to protect employees’ rights”. -1

“Employment should not be conditioned upon whether you will agree to serve as a human guinea pig. We will be appealing this case to the U.S. Court of Appeals and the Supreme Court if necessary,” Mr. Woodfill said.-1

“All of my clients continue to be committed to fighting this unjust policy,”…“If this ruling is allowed to stand, employers across the country will be able to force their employees to participate in a vaccine trial as a condition for employment. This legal battle has only just begun.”-1

  • Dr Peter McCullough in an interview with the Corona-Ausscuss stated that this will go to the Texas Supreme Court -4


Further Research

  • Read the original court ruling here:
  • Children’s Health Defense has prepared this document for employees, students and others who may face unwanted vaccine mandates. The document, which outlines the legal arguments for why the EUA vaccines can’t be mandated, can be shared with employers and universities :



  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4–56—June-11-2021:6


Texas, Houston, Hospital, Mandate, Vaccine, Emergency Use, Nuremberg, Cases in the United States

Back to All Cases