ICC: UK Nuremberg Case
Re: the request to investigate the extreme actions taken by the UK government (& allies) to allegedly stop a deadly virus as Crimes Against Humanity
Back to All Cases
Facts of the Case
- Filed: Dec 6, 2021
- Location: The Hague, The Netherlands
- Court: International Criminal Court
- Case #:
- Plaintiff: Rose, Yeadon, Corbyn, Sexton, O’Looney, McStay, Shotbolt
- Defendant: UK Government, et al
- Trial Type: Request for Trial & Investigation
- Judge: TBD
- Status: Ongoing
- Verdict: TBD
*updated: Feb 24, 2022
Violation of The Nuremberg Code
The Nuremberg Code is a set of ethical principles for medical research that emerged from the “Doctors Trial” in Nuremberg after World War II. The Nuremberg war crimes tribunal established 10 standards that physicians must adhere to when conducting experiments on human subjects. [4]
Chief among these codes of ethics is the need for informed consent to participate in medical experiments. The Nuremberg Code has also been the basis for other guidelines and laws in the field of medical ethics, including the 1965 Declaration of Helsinki, which obliges practicing physicians “to act in the best interests of the patient when providing medical care.” [4]
Although not a binding law, the complaint alleges that the Nuremberg Code qualifies as a source of international law under Article 21(1)(b) of the Rome Statute, which incorporates international law, international treaties, customary international law and principles of law recognized by civilized nations are recognized as equivalent. [4]
see more here: Pfizer Trovan Case
War Crimes, Genocide & Crimes against Humanity
War crimes fall under Article 8 of the Rome Statute. [4]
We submit to you that a covert war has been waged against the people of the United Kingdom (and the world) through the release of the biological weapon SARS-Cov-2 and the additional bioweapon, m-RNA gene therapy ‘vaccines’. We submit that the people of the United Kingdom (and the world) are under systemic attack from those who released the before mentioned biological weapons and by those individuals within the UK Government and international leaders against which we have brought this request, who seek to serve the same agenda. We therefore submit that the contextual element of a war crime has been met and the alleged crimes took place in the context of an international and non-international armed conflict [2]
Pursuant to the Rome Statute’s Article 6, – “genocide” means any of the following acts committed with intent to destroy, in whole or in part, a national, ethnical, racial, or religious group, as such: [2]
- (a) Killing members of these groups: the group in this case is in principle “the entire population of the United Kingdom” (and the world) starting with the elderly, chronically ill and disabled.
- (b) Causing serious bodily harm or mental harm to members of the group
- (c) Deliberately inflicting on the group conditions of life, calculated to bring about its physical destruction in whole or in part
- (d) Imposing measures intended to prevent births within the group:
Article 7 of the Rome Statute covers crimes against humanity, including: [4]
- Murder
- Extermination
- Imprisonment or serious deprivation of physical liberty in violation of the fundamental rules of international law
- Torture
- Forced sterilizations
- Persecution of an identifiable group
- Apartheid and other inhumane acts
The specific charges are further explained in the complaint and substantiated with data.
Back to All Cases