Dr Habig Sentencing Opinion

Dr Habig Sentencing Opinion

Article: Dr Habig Sentencing Opinion

Re: the Relevance & State of German Justice following the Sentencing of Dr Habig

 

Back to All Cases

“Justice at its Lowest Ebb”

(Translation from German article in Transition News – July 2, 2023)

[text emphasis in bold by CoronaCases]


“Once we violate the realm of law

and enter the realm of arbitrariness,

I see in it only the beginning of the end.”

Otto von Bismarck

Dear Readers,

Last week, German justice reached its nadir. The medical doctor,Heinrich Habig was sentenced to two years and ten months in prison for issuing vaccination certificates in 207 cases without vaccinating his patients. He has been in pre-trial detention for over a year (here, here and here).

The decision is only a partial verdict. The trial for more than 400 other possible “fake vaccinations” will be continued in a month. If the doctor is also convicted in these cases, he could face up to five years in prison. Probably purely by chance, the law on “issuing false health certificates” was tightened in November 2021.

In his defence, Habig invoked his oath to the medical association. According to their professional code of conduct, he was forbidden to follow instructions which, in his eyes, were against his ethos and humanity. This was exactly the case when people were forced to be “vaccinated”.

As trial observers report, the prosecutor actually stated in her plea that there were no cases of severe side effects of vaccination. Such claims were “contrarian ideology”.

Since the vaccination campaigns began, there has been a high excess mortality worldwide-even the director of the European Medicines Agency, Emer Cooke, has admitted that over 1.7 million adverse reactions had been registered in the EU by February 2023. Pfizer/BioNTech’s Comirnaty alone accounted for almost one million, 0.9 per cent of which were deaths.

In view of these facts, such statements are staggering. Especially in light of the fact that only a minimal fraction of adverse vaccination events are ever reported.

Even more staggering: before the responsible politicians”obliged” people to receive the experimental shot, they knew that it would neither prevent infection nor transmission of the virus (here, here and here). The approval studies had never investigated this either. These are facts, not “contrarian ideologies”.

Humans tend to forget quickly. Therefore, it is worth remembering that the “vaccination campaigns” were an historic attack on the physical integrity and dignity of millions of people. And it must be assumed that governments deliberately drove their citizens onto the open knife.

Will politicians and their hand-picked scientists be held accountable for this? Not in the slightest. Those responsible for this outrageous event will not be prosecuted politically or legally, they will simply be allowed to continue.

The verdict is a disgrace for a democratic country. It brings back memories of the darkest “pandemic” times, of this highly anti-democratic and totalitarian hunt for critics of the official narrative, which in turn was reminiscent of another dark era in German history.

People who followed their conscience and had the courage to speak the truth and act accordingly to protect others from harm were systematically censored, slandered, their existence destroyed and legally persecuted. Nothing has changed in this regard.

This trial is not about justice, but only about making a political example to force people to obey, according to the motto: “Punish one, educate a hundred.”

Sincerely
Wiltrud Schwetje


Keywords

Article, Commentary, Covid Health Pass, free speech, Germany, Green Pass, Habig, Imprisonment, Justice, Microbiology, Passes, Passport, Rights, Schwetje, Transition News


Back to All Cases

 

Legal Opinion-Bahner-VaxLegality

Legal Opinion-Bahner-VaxLegality

Legal Opinion

Re: the illegal implementation of the vaccines & violation of German & EU Medical Laws

 

Back to All Cases

Legal Report written by the German lawyer Beate Bahner, outlining the many violations under German & EU Law of the Covid Inoculation program. (Dated Dec 27, 2021)

  • Section 1 : is the full original document (in German)
  • Section 2 : is a ‘Working English’ translation made by Corona Cases of item “9. Summary” of lawyer Bahner’s document

(i.e. it is not an ‘official translation’ authorized for legal purposes but only intended as an aid to understanding of the main content of the German summary.)

  • Section 3 : is a Video in which she warns of the Criminal Consequences of participating in the inoculation program (with English Subtitles).

1

Click the “View Fullscreen” button below to get full functionality in fullscreen.


2

9. Summary

1. A substance may only be used for the manufacture of a medicinal product if the intended use is either described in a monograph in accordance with the pharmacopoeia in a monograph, or extensive additional studies, including toxicity studies and clinical studies are submitted for the new new excipients. 

2. The sense and purpose of all German and European pharmaceutical regulations is the protection of people through the quality, safety and efficacy of medicinal products.

3. EMA [the European Medicines Agency] has imposed special conditions on BioNTech – particularly with regard to the two lipid nanoparticles, ALC 0315 and ALC 0159 in particular, as these are novel adjuvants for the Comirnaty vaccine and used for the first time on humans and in a novel way.

4. The corresponding special conditions of the EMA (specific obligations SO2, SO4, SO5) for these novel adjuvants had to be fulfilled by Biontech by July 2021.

5. Both the EMA report on the extension of the conditional marketing authorization in October 2021 as well as the safety data sheet of Pfizer for Comirnaty dated 7.12.2021 show that these conditions have not been fulfilled and that the required documentation is not available. It says: “No data available”. 

6. This is a violation of the principles of good manufacturing practice and thus also a a violation of the recognized pharmaceutical rules in the sense of § 8 para. 1 no. 1 AMG. According to this, it is forbidden to bring medicinal products into the market such that “by deviation from the recognized pharmaceutical rules, their quality is not insignificantly reduced”.

7. The quality is already reduced by the fact alone that two essential ingredients contained in Comirnaty are not intended for use in or on humans and are therefore considered “novel excipients” for which special documents and evidence must be provided.

8. In addition, lipid-related impurities in the vaccine are already documented in EMA’s registration dossier. Impurities of the vaccine are documented. These impurities are likely to increase in the light of further information on the reduction in filtration processes of the adjuvant nanolipid ALC-0315, these impurities may have even increased. With the reduction of the filtering processes, the marketing authorization holder would also violate S02, SO4 and SO5 of EMA in the marketing authorization notice.

9. Finally, according to the safety reports of the Paul Ehrlich Institute, the vaccine shows an alarming number of harmful effects that far beyond what is “justifiable” according to medical science.

10. Due to this fact, there is furthermore a violation of § 5 para. 1 AMG namely, a violation of the prohibition of the marketing and use of questionable medicinal products. Thus, not only the manufacturers but also the vaccinating physicians, as well as all persons responsible for a vaccination with Comirnaty are subject to the regulations of the Medicinal Products Act.

11. Violations of § 8 AMG and § 5 AMG are classified as criminal offenses according to § 95 para. 1 no. 1 and no. 3a and are punishable by up to 3 years’ imprisonment. Negligent commission is also punishable, § 95 para. 4 AMG.

12. A particularly serious case of this offense with imprisonment of up to 10 years if another person is exposed to the risk of death or serious injury to body or health, § 95 (3) No. 2 AMG. In this case is the manufacture, distribution and use of the vaccine Comirnaty contrary to the prohibitions of §§ 5 and 8 AMG. is intentionally realized.

13. Furthermore, vaccination may not be carried out in the case of allergies to a component of the vaccine. Therefore, all persons to be vaccinated must be tested in advance for a possible allergy to one of the components in order to exclude any contraindication to the vaccination.

14. Therefore, a person may not be vaccinated until he or she has been tested for tolerance to each of the components of the vaccine with respect to allergic compatibility and the tolerance to all components of the Comirnaty vaccine has been medically confirmed.

15. Until then, vaccination with the Comirnaty vaccine must be prohibited due to the possibility of a serious health hazard.

16. An infringement not only violates the aforementioned provisions of the Medicinal Products of the Medicines Act, but also other principles of general criminal law.

17. All statements also apply to the vaccine Spikevax from MODERNA!

Heidelberg, 27 December 2021

Beate Bahner[signed]


3

Source: shortXXvids


 

Keywords

Bahner, Beate Bahner, BioNTech, Cominarty, EMA, European Medicines Agency, germany, imprisonment, Legal Opinion, Pfizer, prison, punishment


Back to All Cases

 

Fake Jab Pass Case

Fake Jab Pass Case

Fake Jab Pass Case

Re: the Legality of a Medical Doctor Certifying a Person as “Vaccinated” when they are not, in order to spare them the Dangers of Injury or Death from a Mandated Untested Toxic Injection.

 

Back to All Cases

Facts of the Case

  • Dates: June 2023
  • Location: Germany
  • Court: Regional Court of Bochum
  • Case #:
  • Plaintiff: State prosecutor Tophoff
  • Defendant’s Lawyer: Wilfried Schmitz
  • Defendant: Dr. Heinrich Habig, Fatima Habig
  • Trial Type: Criminal Complaint
  • Judge: Petra Breywisch-Lepping
  • Status: Ongoing – Under Appeal
  • Verdict: Guilty (partial verdict)


*updated July 10, 2023

 

Background

Dr. Heinrich Habig is a 67 year-old medical doctor with his own practice who, in dealing with patients wishing to avoid taking the Covid-19 injections for valid safety concerns, yet needing to participate in society for work or family needs, issued vaccination certificates without actually injecting his patients. (1)

Dr. Habig was reported to the police by another doctor, observed by the police for a period following which his practice was raided on 21st January 2022 and records removed. (1)

Another sad climax in the case occurred on 14 May 2022 when police officers picked up Heinrich Habig from the flat of an acquaintance and took him to the Bochum correctional institution (JVA). The 67-year-old doctor has now been in pre-trial detention there under strict security measures for over a year. Charges were only brought on 12 November 2022. The trial began in January 2023. (1)

 
Difficult prison conditions

Dr. Habig’s wife, Fatima Habig [who is a co-defendant, having been accused of aiding and abetting her husband] was only allowed to visit her husband twice a month under supervision for about one hour. In addition to the presence of a prison officer, the prosecutor Tophoff requested the presence of a woman who listens in on the Habig couple’s conversations – pure harassment, according to lawyer Wilfried Schmitz. During one of these visits, the couple talked about past holidays, which led the prosecution to assume that there was an “increased risk of absconding”. (3)

Due to the allegedly increased risk of escape, the 67-year-old accused was even transported to court in hand and foot cuffs, which were removed from him only shortly before he entered the courtroom. After the trial days, the doctor often had to wait for hours in the cold court cellar, also with hand and foot cuffs on, until he was brought back to the prison. Only when lawyer Schmitz for Heinrich Habig and lawyer Stefan Schlüter for Fatima Habig were called in as elective defence lawyers in February did they ensure that the shackles were removed. (3)

The two grandchildren (eight and ten years old) have only been allowed to visit their grandfather once in prison. Before his pre-trial detention, they were with their grandparents every day. Another human low point occurred on Heinrich Habig’s birthday, which was also the day of the trial: Fatima Habig took two steps towards her husband at the end of the trial day to congratulate him, which promptly led to frantic shouts from the judge for the prison officers, who then prevented the couple from hugging briefly. (3)

A partial verdict was delivered by the judge in the week of June 26th 2023. (2)

An appeal against the verdict is possible.

 

Significance

First doctor in Germany to be given a severe jail sentence for issuing false vaccination certificates.

 

Plaintiff’s Argument

As trial observers report, the prosecutor actually stated in her plea that there were no cases of severe side effects of vaccination. Such claims were “contrarian ideology”. (2)

 

Defendant’s Argument

In his defence, Dr. Habig invoked his oath to the medical association. According to their professional code of conduct, he was forbidden to follow instructions which, in his eyes, were against his ethos and humanity. This was exactly the situation when people were forced to be “vaccinated”. (2)

 

Relevant Prior Judgements/ Cases

…More information is needed…

 

Decision

Medical doctor, Heinrich Habig was sentenced to two years and ten months in prison for issuing vaccination certificates in 207 cases without vaccinating his patients. (2)

The trial for more than 400 other possible “fake vaccinations” will be continued in a month. If the doctor is also convicted in these cases, he could face up to five years in prison. Probably purely by chance, the law on “issuing false health certificates” was tightened in November 2021. (2)

 

Aftermath

Transition News wrote

Last week, German justice reached its nadir … This trial is not about justice, but only about making a political example to force people to obey, according to the motto: “Punish one, educate a hundred.”

Process observer and lawyer Chris Moser commented

that “The reasoning of the judgement leaves a lot to be desired … Only allegations were made, not a single subsumption. According to the court, there are no grounds for justification or excuse. Instead, the court accuses Heinrich Habig of having a ‘hostile attitude towards the law’. (4)(5)

 

Media


Speech in support of Dr. Habig outside Bochum detention Centre -Feb 18, 2023

source: YouTube


Miriam Hope on Dr Heinrich Habig Trial Verdict -Jun 29 2023

source: Odysee / longXXvids


12 yr old Pfizer Vaccine Trial Victim, Maddie -July 2021

source: UK Column News


Prof Perronne WHO Vaccine Expert -Jan 12 2022

source: Rumble Doctors for Covid Ethics


CDC Says Vax is Not Effective -Aug 19 2021

source: Odysee / shortXXvids

 

References

  1. paulbrandenburg.com/bericht/patienten-vor-falscher-impfung-bewahrt-arzt-seit-ueber-einem-jahr-in-u-haft/
  2. English Translation of Corona Transition Article -July 2 2023
  3. paulbrandenburg.com/bericht/patienten-vor-falscher-impfung-bewahrt-arzt-seit-ueber-einem-jahr-in-u-haft/
  4. reitschuster.de/post/skandal-urteil-fast-drei-jahre-jahre-haft-fuer-nicht-impfarzt/
  5. ChrisMoser/398 (telegram)

 

Keyword

Censorship, Code of Conduct, Coercion, Covid Health Pass, Fake Pass, False, First Do No Harm, Free Speech, Germany, Green Pass, Habig, Hippocratic Oath, Imprisonment, Justice, Microbiology, Passes, Passport, Persecution, Rights, Truth, Vaccination Certificates 


Back to All Cases