Dr Habig Sentencing Opinion

Dr Habig Sentencing Opinion

Article: Dr Habig Sentencing Opinion

Re: the Relevance & State of German Justice following the Sentencing of Dr Habig

 

Back to All Cases

“Justice at its Lowest Ebb”

(Translation from German article in Transition News – July 2, 2023)

[text emphasis in bold by CoronaCases]


“Once we violate the realm of law

and enter the realm of arbitrariness,

I see in it only the beginning of the end.”

Otto von Bismarck

Dear Readers,

Last week, German justice reached its nadir. The medical doctor,Heinrich Habig was sentenced to two years and ten months in prison for issuing vaccination certificates in 207 cases without vaccinating his patients. He has been in pre-trial detention for over a year (here, here and here).

The decision is only a partial verdict. The trial for more than 400 other possible “fake vaccinations” will be continued in a month. If the doctor is also convicted in these cases, he could face up to five years in prison. Probably purely by chance, the law on “issuing false health certificates” was tightened in November 2021.

In his defence, Habig invoked his oath to the medical association. According to their professional code of conduct, he was forbidden to follow instructions which, in his eyes, were against his ethos and humanity. This was exactly the case when people were forced to be “vaccinated”.

As trial observers report, the prosecutor actually stated in her plea that there were no cases of severe side effects of vaccination. Such claims were “contrarian ideology”.

Since the vaccination campaigns began, there has been a high excess mortality worldwide-even the director of the European Medicines Agency, Emer Cooke, has admitted that over 1.7 million adverse reactions had been registered in the EU by February 2023. Pfizer/BioNTech’s Comirnaty alone accounted for almost one million, 0.9 per cent of which were deaths.

In view of these facts, such statements are staggering. Especially in light of the fact that only a minimal fraction of adverse vaccination events are ever reported.

Even more staggering: before the responsible politicians”obliged” people to receive the experimental shot, they knew that it would neither prevent infection nor transmission of the virus (here, here and here). The approval studies had never investigated this either. These are facts, not “contrarian ideologies”.

Humans tend to forget quickly. Therefore, it is worth remembering that the “vaccination campaigns” were an historic attack on the physical integrity and dignity of millions of people. And it must be assumed that governments deliberately drove their citizens onto the open knife.

Will politicians and their hand-picked scientists be held accountable for this? Not in the slightest. Those responsible for this outrageous event will not be prosecuted politically or legally, they will simply be allowed to continue.

The verdict is a disgrace for a democratic country. It brings back memories of the darkest “pandemic” times, of this highly anti-democratic and totalitarian hunt for critics of the official narrative, which in turn was reminiscent of another dark era in German history.

People who followed their conscience and had the courage to speak the truth and act accordingly to protect others from harm were systematically censored, slandered, their existence destroyed and legally persecuted. Nothing has changed in this regard.

This trial is not about justice, but only about making a political example to force people to obey, according to the motto: “Punish one, educate a hundred.”

Sincerely
Wiltrud Schwetje


Keywords

Article, Commentary, Covid Health Pass, free speech, Germany, Green Pass, Habig, Imprisonment, Justice, Microbiology, Passes, Passport, Rights, Schwetje, Transition News


Back to All Cases

 

Public Entertainment Closure Case

Public Entertainment Closure Case

Public Entertainment Closure Case

Re: the Legality of Closing Cinemas & Theatres for Covid

 

Back to All Cases

Facts of the Case

  • Dates: December 2021
  • Location: Brussels
  • Court: Council of State
  • Case #:
  • Plaintiff: Actors & Theatre Union
  • Defendant: PM DeCroo
  • Trial Type:
  • Judge:
  • Status: End
  • Verdict: For the Plaintiff


Background

In December 2021, Prime Minister Alexander De Croo announced the closures, introduced to curb the spread of the Omicron variant of Covid-19. De Croo also restricted people from sports stadiums and imposed capacity limitations in stores, in addition to shutting down entertainment venues. Belgium was not the only European country to enact similar legislation, as Denmark and the Netherlands had done previously. [1]

A union representing actors, performers, and movie theatre owners petitioned the government to overturn its ruling. Thousands of entertainment workers and supporters marched in Brussels on Sunday, accusing the government of “contempt, discrimination, and abuse,” but to no avail, as Health Minister Frank Vandenbroucke told state broadcaster RTBF earlier on Tuesday that “there is no possibility to immediately revise the decision.” [1]

 

Significance

This case challenges the legality for government enforced closures

 

Plaintiff’s Argument

…More information is needed…

 

Defendant’s Argument

…More information is needed…

 

Relevant Prior Judgements/ Cases

A court in Wallonia declared earlier this month that requiring vaccination passes to enter cafes, restaurants, gyms, and other locations was illegal in the region. While the pass is a national government initiative, individual regions are in charge of enforcing its use. (Authorities in Wallonia, on the other hand, have appealed the ruling and stated that vaccine passes will continue to be required.) [1]

 

Decision

The government’s decision to close cinemas, theatres, and other entertainment venues in Belgium has been overturned. [1]

The judgment was made on Tuesday by Belgium’s Council of State, the country’s highest administrative court, nearly a week after Prime Minister De Croo announced the closures. [1]

 

Aftermath

…More information is needed…


Further Research

Court Documents:
  • Read the Court Ruling
In the news:
  • …More information is needed…

 

Media

……

source: ….

….

source: ….

 

References

  1. Belgium’s court rules on Covid’s closure of cinemas and theatres after protest
  2.  

 

Keyword

Belgium, Brussels, Capacity, Cinema, Cinemas, Closure, Council of State, De Croo, Entertainment, Health Minister, Passes, Prime Minister, Stadiums, Theatres, Vandenbroucke, Wallonia


Back to All Cases

 

Fake Jab Pass Case

Fake Jab Pass Case

Fake Jab Pass Case

Re: the Legality of a Medical Doctor Certifying a Person as “Vaccinated” when they are not, in order to spare them the Dangers of Injury or Death from a Mandated Untested Toxic Injection.

 

Back to All Cases

Facts of the Case

  • Dates: June 2023
  • Location: Germany
  • Court: Regional Court of Bochum
  • Case #:
  • Plaintiff: State prosecutor Tophoff
  • Defendant’s Lawyer: Wilfried Schmitz
  • Defendant: Dr. Heinrich Habig, Fatima Habig
  • Trial Type: Criminal Complaint
  • Judge: Petra Breywisch-Lepping
  • Status: Ongoing – Under Appeal
  • Verdict: Guilty (partial verdict)


*updated July 10, 2023

 

Background

Dr. Heinrich Habig is a 67 year-old medical doctor with his own practice who, in dealing with patients wishing to avoid taking the Covid-19 injections for valid safety concerns, yet needing to participate in society for work or family needs, issued vaccination certificates without actually injecting his patients. (1)

Dr. Habig was reported to the police by another doctor, observed by the police for a period following which his practice was raided on 21st January 2022 and records removed. (1)

Another sad climax in the case occurred on 14 May 2022 when police officers picked up Heinrich Habig from the flat of an acquaintance and took him to the Bochum correctional institution (JVA). The 67-year-old doctor has now been in pre-trial detention there under strict security measures for over a year. Charges were only brought on 12 November 2022. The trial began in January 2023. (1)

 
Difficult prison conditions

Dr. Habig’s wife, Fatima Habig [who is a co-defendant, having been accused of aiding and abetting her husband] was only allowed to visit her husband twice a month under supervision for about one hour. In addition to the presence of a prison officer, the prosecutor Tophoff requested the presence of a woman who listens in on the Habig couple’s conversations – pure harassment, according to lawyer Wilfried Schmitz. During one of these visits, the couple talked about past holidays, which led the prosecution to assume that there was an “increased risk of absconding”. (3)

Due to the allegedly increased risk of escape, the 67-year-old accused was even transported to court in hand and foot cuffs, which were removed from him only shortly before he entered the courtroom. After the trial days, the doctor often had to wait for hours in the cold court cellar, also with hand and foot cuffs on, until he was brought back to the prison. Only when lawyer Schmitz for Heinrich Habig and lawyer Stefan Schlüter for Fatima Habig were called in as elective defence lawyers in February did they ensure that the shackles were removed. (3)

The two grandchildren (eight and ten years old) have only been allowed to visit their grandfather once in prison. Before his pre-trial detention, they were with their grandparents every day. Another human low point occurred on Heinrich Habig’s birthday, which was also the day of the trial: Fatima Habig took two steps towards her husband at the end of the trial day to congratulate him, which promptly led to frantic shouts from the judge for the prison officers, who then prevented the couple from hugging briefly. (3)

A partial verdict was delivered by the judge in the week of June 26th 2023. (2)

An appeal against the verdict is possible.

 

Significance

First doctor in Germany to be given a severe jail sentence for issuing false vaccination certificates.

 

Plaintiff’s Argument

As trial observers report, the prosecutor actually stated in her plea that there were no cases of severe side effects of vaccination. Such claims were “contrarian ideology”. (2)

 

Defendant’s Argument

In his defence, Dr. Habig invoked his oath to the medical association. According to their professional code of conduct, he was forbidden to follow instructions which, in his eyes, were against his ethos and humanity. This was exactly the situation when people were forced to be “vaccinated”. (2)

 

Relevant Prior Judgements/ Cases

…More information is needed…

 

Decision

Medical doctor, Heinrich Habig was sentenced to two years and ten months in prison for issuing vaccination certificates in 207 cases without vaccinating his patients. (2)

The trial for more than 400 other possible “fake vaccinations” will be continued in a month. If the doctor is also convicted in these cases, he could face up to five years in prison. Probably purely by chance, the law on “issuing false health certificates” was tightened in November 2021. (2)

 

Aftermath

Transition News wrote

Last week, German justice reached its nadir … This trial is not about justice, but only about making a political example to force people to obey, according to the motto: “Punish one, educate a hundred.”

Process observer and lawyer Chris Moser commented

that “The reasoning of the judgement leaves a lot to be desired … Only allegations were made, not a single subsumption. According to the court, there are no grounds for justification or excuse. Instead, the court accuses Heinrich Habig of having a ‘hostile attitude towards the law’. (4)(5)

 

Media


Speech in support of Dr. Habig outside Bochum detention Centre -Feb 18, 2023

source: YouTube


Miriam Hope on Dr Heinrich Habig Trial Verdict -Jun 29 2023

source: Odysee / longXXvids


12 yr old Pfizer Vaccine Trial Victim, Maddie -July 2021

source: UK Column News


Prof Perronne WHO Vaccine Expert -Jan 12 2022

source: Rumble Doctors for Covid Ethics


CDC Says Vax is Not Effective -Aug 19 2021

source: Odysee / shortXXvids

 

References

  1. paulbrandenburg.com/bericht/patienten-vor-falscher-impfung-bewahrt-arzt-seit-ueber-einem-jahr-in-u-haft/
  2. English Translation of Corona Transition Article -July 2 2023
  3. paulbrandenburg.com/bericht/patienten-vor-falscher-impfung-bewahrt-arzt-seit-ueber-einem-jahr-in-u-haft/
  4. reitschuster.de/post/skandal-urteil-fast-drei-jahre-jahre-haft-fuer-nicht-impfarzt/
  5. ChrisMoser/398 (telegram)

 

Keyword

Censorship, Code of Conduct, Coercion, Covid Health Pass, Fake Pass, False, First Do No Harm, Free Speech, Germany, Green Pass, Habig, Hippocratic Oath, Imprisonment, Justice, Microbiology, Passes, Passport, Persecution, Rights, Truth, Vaccination Certificates 


Back to All Cases