StopVaxCrimComplaint

StopVaxCrimComplaint

Stop Vaccine Criminal Complaint

Re: Request for investigation into the Wrongful Deaths & Adverse Reactions caused by the covid vaccines with the aim to stop it asap

 

Back to All Cases

Facts of the Case

  • Submitted: Dec 20, 2021
  • Location: Charing Cross & Hammersmith Police Stations, London, UK
  • Court: TBD
  • Case #: 6029679/21
  • Plaintiffs: Dr Sam White & retired PC, Mark Sexton
  • Plaintiffs’ Solicitor: Lois Bayliss & Philip Hyland
  • Defendants: Officials in Public Office (names to be released later)
  • Trial Type: Criminal Misconduct
  • Judge:
  • Experts: Written Expert Witness Report Submitted
  • Status: Complaint Rejected for investigation
  • Verdict: Against the Plaintiff


*Updated: Feb 24, 2022

 

Background

On 20th Dec 2021

Dr. Sam White, solicitor Lois Bayliss. retired police constable Mark Sexton and solicitor Philip Hyland, PJH Law attended Charring Cross Police station and then Hammersmith Police Station in London. A criminal complaint has been made and accepted by the Metropolitan police (to investigate and immediately halt the covid vaccine programs). Significant and irrefutable evidence has been presented to the police. (1)

As a result of this, a crime reference number has been issued for Misconduct in Public Office. A Detective Sergeant and Police Constable have been allocated  to assess the complaint (3). A complaint number will be made available in due course. (1)

Of paramount importance and as a matter of public safety the plaintiffs and their lawyers are demanding that the Covid-19 vaccine roll out be stopped immediately and have suggested an address to the nation is made by the Metropolitan Police to advise accordingly. (1)

Solicitor Lois Bayliss has received a large number of e-mails from those damaged by the vaccine. She has called on the general public to provide additional information (to that already documented for the complaint) concerning suspected vaccine injuries including deaths, miscarriages, still births, irregular, stopped or post-menopausal periods post vaccine etc, etc. … where these have occurred. NHS staff are also asked to come forward and speak out about anything they have witnessed. (2)

A number of government departments and in particular, individuals in public office and government have been named as offenders. Necessary supporting evidence has been provided. (1)

Six hours was spent with the police, during which time it was made clear and accepted by the police that all doctors, nurses and can workers are being blackmailed to take the vaccine or lose their jobs. The police were excellent, especially at Hammersmith station where the whole session was recorded. This recording will not be released to avoid prejudicing the investigation. (1)

The Superintendent assistant to Police Commissioner Cressida Dick is aware of the complaint and has acknowledged this fact on Dec 23rd 2021. All 43 Chief Constables in England and Wales have been contacted by e-mail to advise them of the Metropolitan Police’s criminal investigation and the (separate but related) ICC application  (3)  

  •  
On December 31, 2021

Mark Sexton posted an update on the case [4]. In brief he has made public that the case has an official number and

We are now recommending all victims of the V make contact with their local police force.

Due to the evidence being submitted to The Metropolitan police we believe each individual has a right to be classed as a victim of crime.

The injuries attributed to the V must be documented by the police and an appropriate crime number issued.

It could be anything from actual bodily harm through to Grievous bodily harm , manslaughter and ultimately murder

If you believe you are a victim of crime and there is no evidence to the contrary a crime must be recorded.

Again, cite the crime recording standards. If that fails request that a victim statement is taken including a victim personal statement and ask for it to be forwarded to, The CID department at Hammersmith police station using crime reference number;

6029679/21.

He Further notes that many prominent individuals are aware of this case, including: The Mayor of London and Police Crime Commissioner Sadiq Khan, the Superintendent to Cressida Dick, some members of Parliament 

Also

ALL U.K. CHIEF CONSTABLES HAVE BEEN CONTACTED, THEREFORE THIS INFORMATION SHOULD HAVE BEEN FILTERED DOWN TO ALL CONSTABLES AND CIVILIAN STAFF TO BE MADE AWARE AND TO DEAL APPROPRIATELY.

  •  
On January 5, 2022

He submitted 1100 pages of evidence to Hammersmith CID. 2 excellent detectives accepted and signed for the paperwork. They confirmed the crime report is now significant and very lengthy. A number of other world experts have added their details and support and again they were acknowledged by The Met Police. Mark Steele provided a massive amount of evidence relating to the damage the vaccine is causing. The Superintendent acknowledged Mark’s submission. [5]

Michael O Bernicia and his team have added their weight and support to this criminal investigation. The evidence they possess is vast and significant with regards to Midazolam and the deaths/murders attributed to this drug. [5]

  •  
On January 16, 2022

Mark Sexton informed that he was banned from Facebook. [5] and posted a video (see in Media below) providing further information and calling for temperance while reasonably using the law and the police.

  •  
On January 19, 2022

Mark Sexton wrote an open letter to the Metropolitan Police, Hammersmith CID, all serving Police Constable’s and all Police staff.

In it he asked them 12 questions regarding their duties as officers of the law and reminded them that :

The actions or indeed in-actions of every Constable have consequences for that individual officer…You must act to save lives straight away and any unlawful orders to the contrary from senior rank or government must be ignored and appropriately challenged. [6]

  •  
On January 29, 2022

Mark Sexton posted an update vid and an info packet the public can use when discussing the case with the police

  •  
On Feb 22, 2022

The Police rejected the complaint (see decision below)

 

Significance

This, to our best knowledge, is the first criminal complaint brought against UK officials (as yet un-named but including government officials) for criminal misconduct in public office relating to the Covid vaccine roll-out.

 

Plaintiff’s Argument

The Plaintiffs have presented evidence to the police and claimed that this irrefutably shows that the vaccines are doing harm and their use should be ceased immediately.

 

Defendant’s Argument

…More information is needed…

 

Relevant Prior Judgements/ Cases

…More information is needed…

 

Decision

The Met said in a statement: [7]

“It was suggested, by the complainants, that offences including gross negligent manslaughter and misconduct in a public office may have taken place. [7]

“Following an assessment of all the available evidence, it is clear that no criminal offences are apparent. The Metropolitan Police will not be launching a criminal investigation and no further action will be taken.” [7]

Deputy Assistant Commissioner Jane Connors added that vaccines had been approved by all the relevant national and international regulatory bodies. [7]

“They underwent multiple trials and were subject to stringent approval processes. They are in use in more than 100 countries. [7]

“We have found no evidence to support any claims that information about adverse health implications is being suppressed or withheld from the public in the manner that was alleged.” [7]

She goes on to criticise the use of a crime number being misrepresented as evidence of a criminal investigation which, she says, was not the case – and links the use of that number to efforts to disrupt the UK’s vaccination programme. [7]

 

Aftermath

response from Legal Team

Philip Hyland, principal of PJH Law, said: [7]

“This isn’t over.”

“We are disappointed with the inadequacy of reasoning from the Met. We would have expected better.” [7]

The group presented more than 400 witness statements from world-renowned scientists, doctors and vaccine victims, concerned, among other issues, about the safety of the new mRNA vaccines and the validity of the trials. [7]

Mr Hyland said a full response to the police decision would be made public later this week. [7]

 

Related
  • News Uncut understands that the police have not interviewed a single witness in person, which seems odd given the seriousness of the allegations – although they have paid a lot of attention to a few Downing Street parties. [7]
  • Meanwhile India’s drug regulators have decided not to support the Pfizer vaccine because of ongoing investigations into side effects reported in other countries. [7]
  • Meanwhile heart attacks and deaths are noticeably more prevalent. As can be seen the in the unusual number of athletes that have collapsed during live broadcasts. [8,9,10]
  • Last year, a new study conducted by researchers at the Mayo Clinic in Rochester, Minnesota, and published in the (jan 2022) Journal of the American Medical Association (JAMA) concluded that Johnson & Johnson’s Covid vaccine increases the risk of developing a rare and fatal blood clotting disorder in the brain. [11]
  • An Oxford University study early last year also found that the number of people who developed blood clots after vaccination was about the same for Pfizer and Moderna vaccines as for AstraZeneca’s, Market Watch reported. [12]
  • The various Government Vaccine Adverse Reaction and Death monitoring programs continue to see unprecedented levels of reporting of deaths following the injections. see US VAERS, UK Yellow Card [7]
  • In a letter to the Paul-Ehrlich-Institute, a major German health insurer has recorded figures on side effects of Covid vaccines. It said the result was “a significant alarm signal.” According to BKK ProVita, the number of side effects is many times higher than those officially announced by the PEI. (also see Del Bigtree video above)

it says: “In our eyes, there is a considerable under-reporting of vaccination side effects.” The board of BKK ProVita, Andreas Schöfbeck, told the WELT: “According to our calculations, we consider 400,000 doctor visits of our insured due to vaccination complications to date realistic.”

“If these numbers are extrapolated to the entire year and to the population in Germany, probably 2.5-3 million people in Germany have received medical treatment for vaccination side effects after Corona vaccination.”

 


Further Research

Court Documents:
  • Read the Criminal Complaint
In the news:

 

Media

See Senator Johnson’s Forums 1 & 2 with vaccine victims & expert Testimony

See the Grand Jury People’s Court with experts on the dangers of the Injection

Media


German Insurance Co Raises Vaccine Damage Alarm

source: Del Bigtree


Bhakdi, Vax Use Must Stop -Feb 19 2022

source: shortXXvids


M Sexton Update – Jan 29 2022

source: Mark Sexton


Dr White on Corona Ausschuss

Source: Corona Ausschuss


M Sexton Update Jan 16 2022

Source: Mark Sexton


Official Criminal Complaint against Lockdowns

source: longXXvids


Report on Meeting with MPs- Sept 22 2021

source: Mark Sexton


Back to All Cases

 

ICC UK Nuremberg Case

ICC UK Nuremberg Case

ICC: UK Nuremberg Case

Re: the request to investigate the extreme actions taken by the UK government (& allies) to allegedly stop a deadly virus as Crimes Against Humanity

 

Back to All Cases

Facts of the Case

  • Filed: Dec 6, 2021
  • Location: The Hague, The Netherlands
  • Court: International Criminal Court
  • Case #:
  • Plaintiff: Rose, Yeadon, Corbyn, Sexton, O’Looney, McStay, Shotbolt
  • Defendant: UK Government, et al
  • Trial Type: Request for Trial & Investigation
  • Judge: TBD
  • Status: Ongoing
  • Verdict: TBD


*updated: Feb 24, 2022

Background

A complaint has been filed with the Prosecutor of the International Criminal Court on December 6th, 2021 by a team from the UK on behalf of the people alleging crimes committed by UK government officials and international world leaders of various violations of the Nuremberg Code, crimes against humanity, war crimes and crimes of aggression perpetrated against the peoples of the UK. (1)

Acknowledgment was received on the 6th of December 2021, some of those named in the ICC complaint are also named responsible in (in a separate case) the criminal complaint lodged at the (UK) Metropolitan Police. (3)

The applicants state that they have tried to raise their case through the local English police and the English Court system without success. The team is represented by lawyer, Hannah Rose, with co-applicants including: (1)

  •  Dr. Mike Yeadon, who is a former vice-President and Chief Scientist of allergy and respiratory research at Pfizer in respiratory pharmacology,
  • Piers Corbyn – Weather Forecaster, Physicist, Businessman
  • Mark Sexton – Retired Constable
  • John O’Looney – Funeral Director,
  • Johnny McStay – Activist and
  • Louise Shotbolt – Nurse and human rights activist (1)

“The seriousness and extent of the crimes committed in the United Kingdom, highlighted by the scope of people that these crimes affect, that these crimes continue to be committed, the wide range of perpetrators, the recurring patterns of criminality and the limited prospects for accountability at the national level, all weigh heavily in favour of an investigation” . (1)

The complaint focuses on: (2)
  • Violations of the Nuremberg Code 
  • Violation of Article 6 of the Rome Statute 
  • Violation of Article 7 of the Rome Statute 
  • Violation of Article 8 of the Rome 
  • Violation of Article 8 bis3 of the Rome Statute
The Complaint charges the following people: (2)

Based on the extensive claims and enclosed documentation, we charge those responsible for numerous violations of the Nuremberg Code, crimes against humanity, war crimes and crimes of aggression in the United Kingdom, but not limited to individuals in these countries. Perpetrators:

  • Prime Minister for the United Kingdom BORIS JOHNSON,
  • Chief Medical Officer for England and Chief Medical Adviser to the UK Government CHRISTOPHER WHITTY,
  • (former) Secretary of State for Health and Social Care MATTHEW HANCOCK,
  • (current) Secretary of State for Health and Social Care SAJID JAVID,
  • Chief Executive of Medicines and Healthcare products Regulatory Agency (MHRA) JUNE RAINE,
  • Director-General of the World Health Organisation TEDROS ADANHOM GHEBREYESUS,
  • Co-chair of the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation WILLIAM GATES III and Co-chair of the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation MELINDA GATES,
  • Chairman and Chief executive officer of Pfizer ALBERT BOURLA,
  • Chief Executive Officer of AstraZeneca STEPHANE BANCEL,
  • Chief Executive Officer of Moderna PASCAL SORIOT,
  • Chief Executive of Johnson and Johnson ALEX GORSKY,
  • President of the Rockefeller Foundation DR RAJIVSHAH,
  • Director of the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Disease (NIAID) DR ANTHONY FAUCI,
  • Founder and Executive Chairman of the World Economic Forum KLAUS SCHWAB,
  • President of EcoHealth Alliance DR PETER DASZACK

John O’Looney, a joint applicant on this request is a funeral director running his own funeral home in Milton Keynes. As a funeral director, Mr. O’Looney testified that he saw a massive effort made to deliberately inflate Covid death numbers. Cancer patients and stroke victims and even one guy that was run over all ended up with Covid on their death certificate’.(1)

The applicants state that “It is our intention to present to you and detail how, in the United Kingdom this year, the Government of the United Kingdom, with its Ministers and senior officials have violated the Nuremberg Code not only in a single aspect but in many aspects”. (1)

What is the International Criminal Court?

The International Criminal Court (ICC) is an intergovernmental organization and international tribunal based in The Hague, Netherlands. The ICC’s activities are governed by an international treaty, the Rome Statute, which has been ratified by more than 120 countries, including the US. [4]

The ICC is a permanent, independent court that investigates crimes that concern the international community, such as charges of genocide, war crimes, crimes against humanity and crimes of aggression. In theory, member states are supposed to cooperate with the court, but this is not always the case. [4]

If warranted, the court can prosecute and try individuals accused of this type of crime, but it will usually only do so if the member state fails to take appropriate legal action against the perpetrator, which can happen if a government tries to deprive the person in question. to protect against criminal responsibility. As noted in the complaint: [4]

We have tried to raise this matter through the local English police and the English legal system, but without success; after several attempts we even failed to register the case with the police or with the court. 

The ICC Statute states: “The ICC is intended to complement, not replace, national criminal justice systems; it only prosecutes cases where a state is unwilling or unable to actually initiate an investigation or prosecution (Article 17(1)(a)).

This is one such case and that is why we are addressing the ICC directly.” 

However, the ICC relies on the national law enforcement agencies of the states to arrest individuals, so a member state can still limit the ICC’s ability to bring a criminal to justice. The ICC does not have its own police force to carry out arrest warrants or arrests. In this case, the suspects are scattered across different countries. According to the ICC complaint, the 16 suspects have violated the Nuremberg Code and four articles of the Rome Statute. [4]

 

Significance

This case is important as it charges the UK government with multiple counts of Crimes Against Humanity, resulting from their handling of the alleged covid epidemic.

 

Plaintiff’s Argument

The official complaint challenges every aspect of the Covid measures, including (2)

  • The efficacy of PCR tests & Masks,
  • Inflated Covid figures
  • The Rebranding of Flu, Pneumonia, and Respiratory Infections.
  • The Inclusion of Graphene Hydroxide
  • Other Areas and Parallels to 1930s Germany
  • The safety & efficacy of the vaccines
  • Violation of informed consent
  • Suppression alternative treatments
  • Censorship
  • Violation of the Nuremberg Code & genocide & torture
  • Apartheid & the Vaccine Passports
  • & more

Through providing an over ten-thousand-word document, the team has gathered extensive evidence that are areas of concern have occurred under the guise of measures or interventions for the prevention of a “virus.” (1)

Inflated Covid figures

A particularly notable and important area addressed within this documented complaint, is the fact that the number of covid-19 cases has been artificially inflated due to the inaccuracy and unreliability of the PCR testing. Arguably, without these inflated figures, there would have been no need for the other measures and interventions that are now be classed as crimes against humanity. (1)

The team highlight the fact that a covid death is recorded if an individual died for any reason within 28 days of a positive Covid-19 test (that was confirmed with the inaccurate and unreliable PRC tests). (1)

“These deaths are being recorded as Covid-19 regardless of whether Covid-19 was the factual cause of death” (1)

Rebranding of Flu, Pneumonia, and Respiratory Infections

Additionally, another way the Covid-19 statistics have been artificially inflated is by the ‘rebranding’ of the common influenza, pneumonia, and other respiratory infections as covid -19. The applicants cited data from the ONS which showed that deaths in 2018 from influenza and pneumonia amounted to 29,516 and in 2019, 26,398. (1)

However, deaths in 2020 for influenza were recorded at just 394 and pneumonia at 13,619. (1)

Violation of The Nuremberg Code

The Nuremberg Code is a set of ethical principles for medical research that emerged from the “Doctors Trial” in Nuremberg after World War II. The Nuremberg war crimes tribunal established 10 standards that physicians must adhere to when conducting experiments on human subjects. [4]

Chief among these codes of ethics is the need for informed consent to participate in medical experiments. The Nuremberg Code has also been the basis for other guidelines and laws in the field of medical ethics, including the 1965 Declaration of Helsinki, which obliges practicing physicians “to act in the best interests of the patient when providing medical care.” [4]

Although not a binding law, the complaint alleges that the Nuremberg Code qualifies as a source of international law under Article 21(1)(b) of the Rome Statute, which incorporates international law, international treaties, customary international law and principles of law recognized by civilized nations are recognized as equivalent. [4]

see more here: Pfizer Trovan Case

War Crimes, Genocide & Crimes against Humanity
War crimes fall under Article 8 of the Rome Statute. [4]
We submit to you that a covert war has been waged against the people of the United Kingdom (and the world) through the release of the biological weapon SARS-Cov-2 and the additional bioweapon, m-RNA gene therapy ‘vaccines’. We submit that the people of the United Kingdom (and the world) are under systemic attack from those who released the before mentioned biological weapons and by those individuals within the UK Government and international leaders against which we have brought this request, who seek to serve the same agenda. We therefore submit that the contextual element of a war crime has been met and the alleged crimes took place in the context of an international and non-international armed conflict [2]
 
Pursuant to the Rome Statute’s Article 6, – “genocide” means any of the following acts committed with intent to destroy, in whole or in part, a national, ethnical, racial, or religious group, as such: [2]
  • (a) Killing members of these groups: the group in this case is in principle “the entire population of the United Kingdom” (and the world) starting with the elderly, chronically ill and disabled.
  • (b) Causing serious bodily harm or mental harm to members of the group
  • (c) Deliberately inflicting on the group conditions of life, calculated to bring about its physical destruction in whole or in part
  • (d) Imposing measures intended to prevent births within the group:

Article 7 of the Rome Statute covers crimes against humanity, including: [4]

  • Murder
  • Extermination
  • Imprisonment or serious deprivation of physical liberty in violation of the fundamental rules of international law
  • Torture
  • Forced sterilizations
  • Persecution of an identifiable group
  • Apartheid and other inhumane acts

The specific charges are further explained in the complaint and substantiated with data.

The document concludes with a strong request: (2)

WE WANT TO REPEAT: It is of the utmost urgency that ICC take immediate action, taking all of this into account, to stop the rollout of covid vaccinations, introduction of unlawful vaccination passports and all other types of illegal warfare mentioned herein currently being waged against the people of the United Kingdom by way of an IMMEDIATE court injunction”.

 

Defendant’s Argument

…More information is needed…

 

Decision

 

Media


InfoWars Update on ICC Complaint

source: InfoWars


UK Constable Reports Criminal Complaints – June 18 2021

source: Mark Sexton


Mark Sexton Update -Nov 13 2021

source: Mark Sexton


Funeral Director O’Looney on Corona Ausschuss #72

source: longXXvids

 

References

  1. UK Team File Complaint of Crimes Against Humanity With The International Criminal Court
  2. The original Complaint
  3. Mark Sexton’s urgent message to all 43 Chief Constables of England & Wales
  4. Will these COVID criminals be charged by an independent court?

 

Keyword

ICC, Nuremberg Code, International Criminal Court, Den Haag, Netherlands, Crimes against Humanity, Genocide, Torture, Johnson, Gates, WHO,  Bourla, Schwab, Tedros, Hancock, Javid, Whitty, PCR, Yeadon, Sexton, Corbyn, O’Loony


Back to All Cases