Swiss – home

Presidential Crimes Case

Presidential Crimes Case

Re: the Legality for a Head of State to knowingly promise (to lie) false benefits for a new & untested medical procedure

Back to All Cases

Facts of the Case

Dates: Dec 2, 2022 (filed)
Location: Police station in commune of residence
Court: Office of the Attorney General of Switzerland
Case #: TBD
Plaintiff: Pascal Najadi
Plaintiff’s Lawyer:

Defendant: Swiss President, Alain Berset
Trial Type: Criminal Complaint
Judge: TBD
Status: Dismissed
Verdict: Dismissed

*updated May 10, 2023

Background

On Friday 2 December, retired Swiss banker Pascal Najadi filed a complaint against the President of Switzerland Alain Berset — who is also the Head of the Department of Home Affairs and a former minister of health — at the police station in his commune of residence. [1] [2]

According to the complaint, the Office of the Attorney General of Switzerland is to start investigations against Berset. As head of the Department of Home Affairs, he was also responsible for the Federal Office of Public Health (FOPH). Berset was accused of abusing his office under Article 312 of the Swiss Criminal Code. [1] [2]

“Members of an authority or officials who abuse their official authority in order to procure an unlawful advantage for themselves or another or to inflict a disadvantage on another shall be punished with imprisonment of up to five years or a fine,” the paragraph reads. [1]

In the criminal complaint, he detailed how the health minister told Swiss television SRF on 27 October 2021 — a month before the referendum on extending the COVID certificate requirement —

“with the certificate, you can show that you are not contagious.” [1] [3]

Federal Councillor Berset then made this statement, even though his FOPH reported on the same day that ten vaccinated people had been hospitalised because of COVID. [1]

The fact that vaccinated people who fell ill at the time were not supposed to be contagious, while unvaccinated people who fell ill were for several days, was already contradictory to the state of knowledge at the time. [1]

Swiss television later added a clarification next to the transcript of the interview that it was “known that vaccinated and recovered people can also be contagious”. [1]

Alain Berset could have known better. But the Federal Councillor had taken into account neither the FOPH’s own statistics nor the statements of the US Health Authority (CDC). [1]

Even statements by Virginie Masserey, who was responsible for the fight against coronavirus at the FOPH at the time, were thrown to the wind by the magistrate. [1] [4]

“Vaccinated people can spread the coronavirus just as frequently as unvaccinated people,” Masserey stated on 3 August 2021 — three months before Berset’s controversial TV statement. [1] [4]

Masserey also stated what the federal task force had also found. Thus, Federal Councillor Berset told a lie on television a few weeks before the ballot. [1]

Either the health minister lied, or he acted with gross negligence — an act that is also prosecuted in Switzerland. The vaccination campaign has cost Swiss taxpayers at least CHF 500m. Additionally, several citizens have died as a result of the vaccine. [1]

In the reporting period from January 2021 to 22 November 2022, 6,199 “serious cases” were reported to the vaccination regulatory agency Swissmedic. This corresponds to a good 38% of all reports. [1]

The then Federal Councillor Berset contributed to a two-tier society with his false COVID vaccination certificate statement on television; such a division violates the constitution. [1]

“Accountability must also apply to Federal Councillors, not only to private persons. Fortunately, we live in a direct democracy, and we, the Swiss people, are the sovereign here,” said Najadi. [1]
Mr. Najadi, himself and his family fully jabbed and boostered, describes his realization that the entire narrative, especially regarding vaccine efficacy, is based on contradictions, misleading and unsupported claims and perhaps malicious intent. [5]

SwissMedic Email Exchange

After a series of email exchanges with the Swiss vaccination regulatory agency to discover the ideal mRNA injection dosage for a person of a particular body weight, to understand specifically how much spike protein the injection supposedly generates in the body to allegedly fight against covid . [5]

in their letter from Jan 6 2023, The agency confirms that the injection is intended to induce the cells to produce spike protein. They further wrote that the injection “protects the person from the virus” by teaching the immune system to create antibodies in response to the spike proteins delivered via the injection. [5]

Mr. Najadi, responds to this: “Which we know from Pfizer is not true! The producer admits that it does not protect against the virus” [5]

SwissMedic continues to write that the production of spike protein is dependent on several factors such as immune weakness, illnesses, individual factors, etc…so we cannot tell you how much spike protein has been produced in your body. [5]

Mr. Najadi concludes from this that, “this confirms that they do not know the dosage of the mRNA to the body weight and they don’t know what happens with the spike protein reproduction triggered by the mRNA which proves that they have no clue what they are talking about.” [5]

SwissMedic ends the letter : “we would like to note that this exchange is forthwith ended- a quasi-scientific exchange like this one is overloading our resources that we need in this crisis.” [5]

Significance

First Corona criminal complaint to accuse a head of state of lying to the public about vaccine effectiveness

Plaintiff’s Argument

In essence Najadi’s argument is very simple and already covered above. It is captured in two points of fact which he can evidence:

Najadi asserts that the Swiss president made false statements to the public

The elected president of Switzerland (… today responsible for the health of 8 million people) on 27th Oct 2021 went on national TV to promote the public vote for the Covid Law and the vaccination certificate. [3]