Vaccine – home

LegalOpinion-PEI-Negligence

Legal Opinion: PEI Negligence of Duty

Re: the Negligence by the PEI not to investigate the Unusual Death statistics as it is directed to by law

Background

This is a summary of the legal opinion of lawyer Frank Großenbach representing data analyst Tom Lausen and the arguments of Martin Sichert (MP) given in a press conference in the Bundestag 12th Dec 2022.

Full (in German) press conference -Dec 12 2022

English subtitled video of M Sichert’s introduction -Dec 12 2022

Link to lawyer Großenbach’s letter to the PEI detailing their obligation under law to investigate unexpected deaths. (in original German and English translation)

The conference concerned itself with results from the analysis of medical diagnostic code data obtained by M Sichert by an FOI requestto the National Association of Statutory Health Insurance Physicians (BVK). This data base covers about 72 million anonymised patient diagnosticrecords from doctor visits in Germany.

Expert Lausen’s analysis clearly showed an alarming deviation (increase) in the numbers of deaths associated with typical indicator codes temporally associated with onset of vaccination with the Covid-19 vaccines. Additionally, increased frequencies of diagnoses of a range of illnesses were observed also in temporal association with onset of vaccinations.

Link to Tom Lausen’s presentation

Legal Opinion:

The opinion of Sichert, Lausen and their lawyer,Großenbach is that the Paul-Ehrlich-Institute is in clear breach of its duty under law to investigate the significant number of unexpected deaths identified by Lausen using the same data available from the BVK.

The Paul Ehrlich Institute has NOT requested this data so far. They have never requested the data that could be obtained by means of a simple Freedom of Information (FOI) request to the National Association of Statutory Health Insurance Physicians. (ref. Tom Lausen presentation slide #24)

Großenbach’s detailed legal argument against the PEI can be found here in his letter (in original German and English translation)

In a German language article published Dec 20, 2022 (English translation here ) The Epoch Times summarised Großenbach’s legal opinion as follows:

Frank Großenbach, a lawyer from Frankfurt, is also of the opinion that there is an “initial suspicion” because of the excess mortality “of at least 30,000 in 2021, the year of the vaccinations”, which is proven by data. This is not only sufficient, but even obligatory, to “withdraw the mRNA active substances from circulation” until it can be “safely excluded” that the excess mortality is due to the vaccinations. According to section 69 of the Medicines Act and due to the legal mandate according to section 13, paragraph 5 of the Infection Protection Act, the occurrence of a “warning signal” is sufficient to immediately withdraw the mRNA active substances from the market. He considers this warning signal to be given after Lausen’s analysis.
At the very least, however, “the population must be informed about the factual connections”, “so that everyone can act in a self-determined manner in their own knowledge of the data on their body”, demanded Großenbach. On 12 December, the day of the AfD press conference, he had already made a statement to the PEI on behalf of Tom Lausen (video at Odysee).
In his estimation, the statements of KBV head Andreas Gassen had even strengthened the position of the vaccination campaign sceptics: “He explains that the presented increased mortality would represent a normal pandemic event. This is a simple assessment of the figures. This assessment is not plausible”. With his statement, Gassen had indirectly “confirmed that the excess mortality determined by Tom Lausen was statistically correct. It is just that his conclusions from the figures presented are different”, explained Großenbach.

Großenbach in his letter to the PEI gave a deadline to respond by Dec 19 2022

If we have not received a statement from you by 12.00 noon on 19 December2022, we must assume that you intend to continue to remain inactive even though the data are now available to you, or if the statement does not make it clear that you are taking appropriate measures, we will immediately report you, the persons addressed in this letter, to the public prosecutor’s office at the Darmstadt Regional Court without further hesitation or waiting, on account of the violation of criminal law associated with the breach of your guarantor status. In order to be able to file a complaint immediately, we will already formulate a complaint now.

Keywords

Article, Bundestag, BVK, Darmstadt Regional Court, Data, Death, Duty, FOI, Gassen, germany, Großenbach, Lausen, Legal Opinion, Mandate, National Association of Statutory Health Insurance Physicians, Negligence, Obligation, Paul Ehrlich Institute, PEI, Sichert, Vaccine, Violation

Back to All Cases

article- German Deaths Analysis 2022

Article: German Deaths Data Analysis 2022

Re: the alarming increase in deaths since the covid injection rollout in Germany & the failure of the PEI & RKI to do this analysis

Back to All Cases

Re-post of original article: (as reported on thegatewaypundit.com Dec 13, 2022)

German Data Analyst Reveals Data from Health Insurance Shows 4 Times Increase in Sudden Deaths Following COVID Vaccine Rollouts

by Jim Hoft

German data analyst Tom Lausen held a conference on Monday in the Bundestag to discuss the massive rise in people who died “suddenly and unexpectedly” after the Covid vaccine rollout.

Only one mainstream journalist was present during the press conference.

The National Association for Statutory Health Insurance Physicians (NASHIP) provided the data covering over 72 million insured Germans.

NASHIP or “Kassenärztliche Bundesvereinigung (KBV),” is the coordinating body of all 17 State Associations of Statutory Health Insurance Physicians in Germany. As of 2018, it represented about 175,000 office-based physicians and psychotherapists.

“The association is also actively involved in negotiations on the range of services provided by statutory health insurance companies and the remuneration of doctors. Furthermore, the KBV carries out a “security mandate” in accordance with Section 75 (1) SGB V, which is intended to ensure that all legally insured patients can receive adequate outpatient care.”

The government agency responsible with assessing the risks of vaccination apparently did not inquire about this information, as stated during the news conference.

“According to Section 13 of the Infection Protection Act, the Robert Koch Institute and the Paul Ehrlich Institute have to evaluate diagnosis codes from the National Association of Statutory Health Insurance Physicians (KBV) at reqular intervals in order to determine vaccination effects. But since the beginning of the corona vaccinations, this data has neither been requested nor evaluated.”

“After numerous inquiries in recent months, the KBV data (period: 2016 to the first quarter of 2022) are available to our health policy spokesman, Martin Sichert,” according to the website.

Gates Vaccine Murder Case 2

Gates Vaccine Murder Case 2

Re: the culpability of Bill Gates & partners in the death of a Woman that died as a result of taking their product (the AstraZeneca Covid vaccine), an experimental drug that promised to save lives.

Back to All Cases

Facts of the Case

Dates: Aug , 2021
Location: Bombay, India
Court: Bombay High Court
Case #: Writ Petition No. 5767 of 2022
No. 5767 of 2022
Plaintiff: Dilip Lunwat (Petitioner)
Plaintiff’s Lawyer: Dipali Ohja

Defendant: Bill Gates, Adar Poonawalla, The Indian State
Trial Type: Writ petition
Justices: Sarang Kotwal & Nitin Jamdar
Status: TBD
Verdict: TBD

*This case was edited & reviewed by the Lawyer Dipali Ohja

*Updated Nov 12, 2022

Background

In October 2021, India’s National Adverse Event Following Immunisation (“AEFI”) committee acknowledged, almost seven months after her death, that the death of Dr. Snehal Lunawat, a 33- year-old doctor from Maharashtra working in Gurugram, was due a Covishield “vaccine.” At the time, Dr. Lunawat’s death was recognised as the third vaccine-induced death by AEFI. [2]

Dr. Lunawat was compelled to take the “vaccine” on 28 January 2021 as she came under the category of health worker. Eight days later, she developed a severe headache and vomiting and was rushed to a hospital where doctors found bleeding in her brain. She died on 1 March 2021. [2]

On 31 January 2022, the deceased doctor’s father, Dilip Lunwat, filed an Rs.10,000 crores or Rs.100,000,000,000 (US$1.34 billion) claim for compensation in the Indian High Court against the State Government of Maharashtra and Adar Poonawalla and his partner Bill Gates. [2]

On 1 September 2022, the Indian Bar Association reported that the Bombay High Court had “issued notice in a vaccine murder case of Dr. Snehal Lunawat where interim compensation of Rs. 1,000 crores (US$126 million approx.) is sought.” The notice was issued on 26 August. The 8 defendants in the case are: [2]

Serum Institute’s CEO Adar Poonawalla
Bill Gates– Partner in the Covishield vaccine
Union of India
State of Maharashtra
Ministry of Health & Family Welfare
Drug Controller General of India
Dr. V.G. Somani – Drug Controller General
Dr. Randeep Guleria, Former Director of AIIMS

Petition also calls for action against social media like Facebook, YouTube, Google and main stream media who are running false narrative & conspiracy theories that vaccines are completely safe and are suppressing the news and information regarding side effects,inefficacy or failure of vaccines. [1]

The case has been scheduled for hearing on 17 November 2022. [2]

Petitioner’s Statement

The Father, Mr. Lunawat has stated in his plea that health workers like his daughter were compelled to take vaccine due to the false narratives created by Drug Controller General of India (DCGI) and Director of All India Institute of Medical Science (AIIMS) that vaccines are safe, a narrative which was endorsed by State authorities as well, without verification. [1]

He stated that his daughter took the vaccine on January 28, 2021 and due to the side effects of the vaccine, she passed away on March 1, 2021. [1]

Pertinently, Mr. Lunawat contended that the Central government’s AEFI committee on October 2, 2021 admitted that the death of his daughter was due to side effects of Covishield vaccine. [1]

“This petition is being filed to give justice to my daughter and in order to save the life of many more people who are likely to be murdered due to such unlawful activities of Respondent authorities,” the plea stated [1]

Covishield is the Oxford-AstraZeneca vaccine made by the Serum Institute of India. [2]

The Oxford-AstraZeneca vaccine has been suspended or has had its use limited in many countries, in some cases temporarily, over safety and efficacy issues. See Wikipedia ‘Oxford–AstraZeneca Covid-19 vaccine’. Bill Gates funded the efforts in manufacturing the Covishield “vaccine.” As a report by The Hindustan Times in August 2020 indicated, Gates had big dreams for Covishield: [2]

The Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation, via its Strategic Investment Fund, will provide at-risk funding of USD 150 million to Gavi, which will then be utilized to support the Serum Institute to manufacture the potential vaccine candidate. The potential Covid-19 vaccine manufactured by SII is likely to be made available to at least 92 countries. [2]
Serum Institute ties up with Bill Gates Foundation, Gavi to speed up Covid-19 vaccine manufacture process, The Hindustan Times, 7 August 2020

Due to deaths caused by covishield a.k.a Astrazeneca globally, around 18 European Countries have banned these vaccines. [1]

Link:https://www.aljazeera.com/news/2021/3/15/which-countries-have-halted-use-of-astrazenecas-covid-vaccine

worldwide cases of compensation claims by victims of side effects of Corona Vaccine:-

As per data with Australian government, 37.8 million vaccine doses had been administered till November 7, 2021 and 78,880 adverse events linked to vaccination were recorded. A portal was being made to enable people to claim damages. At least 10,000 people have registered interest to make a claim, till the report came on news portal. (https://www.wionews.com/world/thousands-of-australians-want-compensation-for-covid-vaccine-side-effects-report-429883). [1]
In UK, up to 920 compensation applications have been filed by people who were left seriously injured after getting the Covid-19 vaccine as claims could hit £110 million. Vikki Spit, from Alston, Cumbria, hopes to qualify for financial support after her fiancé Zion, 48, died of a brain hemorrhage two weeks after getting the AstraZeneca vaccine in May 2021. She claimed his death certificate named the AstraZeneca vaccine but said she has been left in ‘limbo’ after applying for the scheme in June. [1] (https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-10556213/Covid-vaccine-claims-hit-110m-920-compensation-applications-filed.html)

Significance

This case is the world’s first vaccine murder case to get a hearing against Bill Gates and his Indian partner, Adar Poonawalla, CEO of the Serum Institute of India. The significance depending on the outcome could be scandalous for the pharmaceutical industry

Related Prior Judgements/ Cases

The first petition for vaccine murder was filed before the Bombay High court by Smt. Kiran Yadav for claiming compensation of Rs. 100 crores($ 12.6 million approx.) for death of her son Hitesh Kadve. She has also sought criminal prosecution of Bill Gates & others. This case was widely discussed across the globe due to the serious side effects of covishield. (Smt. Kiran Yadav vs. The State of Maharashtra &Ors. Cri. WP No. 6159 of 2021) [1]
Link:-https://childrenshealthdefense.org/defender/bill-gates-indian-government-lawsuit-astrazeneca-vaccine-killed-shri-hitesh-kadve/
In December 2021, in an unrelated case, India’s Central Government told the Supreme Court in its affidavit that there was no immunity for vaccine companies. The Indian Bar Association noted: [2]

It is a major setback to the toxic philanthropist and vaccine mafia’s Kingpin Bill Gates and his partner Adar Poonawalla, and other co-accused who have been prosecuted for mass murders through vaccines. They are also charged for offences of cheating public at large with false narratives and conspiracy theories. [2]
More Trouble for Bill Gates and Adar Poonawalla, Indian Bar Association, 3 December 2021

In a similar case of vaccine murder of two children, Supreme Court on 29.08.2022 took serious cognizance and issued notice to Central Government. [1]
https://indianbarassociation.in/wp-content/uploads/2022/09/Order_29-Aug-2022-Rachana-Gangu-Vs.- Union-of-India.pdf
In another case of vaccine death of a school girl Nova Sabu, the Kerala High Court also took the cognizance and asked central Government to file reply. [1]

News link : https://www.livelaw.in/news-updates/19-year-old-dies-post-covishield-vaccination-kerala-high-court-seeks-centres-response-on-parents-plea-196742?infinitescroll=1

On 10.08.2022, Kerala High Court in the case of Sayeeda Vs Union of India in WP (C) No. 17628 of 2022 has issued directions to the Central Government to immediately formulate guidelines for giving compensation to the victims of deaths or other side effects of vaccines. [1]

Order Link: https://drive.google.com/file/d/1APHixFHhQTGXwzc29CS2g5V7y1Z_-IUH/view?usp=sharing

On August 10 2022, the central government submitted before Kerala High Court that they are in process of formulating policies to provide monetary compensation to victims of side effects of these vaccines. [1]

The matter came before Kerala High Court. The Court observed; [1]

“This is a national calamity which we faced. Of course, I do understand the case is very genuine and it has to be dealt with. As far as the Central government is concerned, similar issues are cropping up in other states also. There has to be an effort to formulate a proper guideline, a proper scheme for compensating these persons and that is being done. Let them bring on record what steps have been taken so that I can pass a reasoned and considered order, rather than an order in vacuum. It is not a laughing matter, I consider it to be very serious“, he orally observed.” [1]

The Court acknowledged the seriousness of the petitioners’ submission that the process has to be hastened since the family members of the victims are facing extreme difficulties consequent to the death of the earning member of the family. [1]

“I find the apprehension expressed by the learned counsel to be well founded. The situation requires urgent action on the part of the National Disaster Management Authority“, the Court said in its order.”. [1]

Largest Health Care Fraud Settlement in U.S. History

Between 2001 and 2007, GSK failed to include certain safety data about Avandia, a diabetes drug. [1]

GSK has agreed to pay $657 million relating to false claims arising from misrepresentations about Avandia. The federal share of this settlement is $508 million and the state share is $149 million. [1]

GSK has agreed to plead guilty to failing to report data to the FDA and has agreed to pay a criminal fine in the amount of $242,612,800 for its unlawful conduct concerning Avandia. [1]

It also includes allegations that GSK paid kickbacks to health care professionals to induce them to promote and prescribe these drugs as well as the drugs Imitrex, Lotronex, Flovent and Valtrex. The United States alleges that this conduct caused false claims to be submitted to federal health care programs. [1]

GSK has agreed to pay $1.043 billion relating to false claims arising from this alleged conduct. The federal share of this settlement is $832 million and the state share is $210 million.” [1]

Plaintiff’s Argument

i) To hold that, the petitioner’s daughter was given vaccine under deception, and false narratives by the state authorities that the vaccines are completely safe and if any serious or severe side effects occurs then the state authorities have define treatment, however when she suffered serious side effects then there was no treatment available and lastly she died due to side effects of vaccines as has been confirmed by the Government of India’s AEFI Committee, therefore state authorities are responsible for causing her death by spreading false narratives and therefore, they are bound to compensate the petitioner in view of law laid by Hon’ble Supreme Court and Hon’ble High Courts and more particularly in the case of Registrar General, High Court of Meghalaya Vs. State of Meghalaya 2021 SCC OnLineMegh 130; [1]

ii)To hold that the respondent state authorities are having callous criminal attitude as till date they have not changed their frequently asked questions and even on 12.2021 they are continuing their false narratives that they are having definite treatment for any side effects of vaccines; [1]

iii) To hold that as per law laid down by the Constitution Bench of Hon’ble Supreme Court in Anita Khushwha’s case (2016) 8 SCC 509, the value of life of Indian citizen is not less than that of any person across the world either of America or of any country and therefore the Petitioner is entitled to the compensation in proportion to the compensation granted in other similar cases in United State, Singapore etc. [1]

iv) To hold that, in view of factual and legal position mentioned in the petition, the petitioner is entitled for an interim compensation of Rs. 1000 Crores as a deterrence to guilty and as succor to petitioner’s family for loss of life of petitioner’s daughter due to deliberate act of commission and omission on the part of respondents, with a liberty to the state authorities to recover it from the responsible officials and Serum Institute, Pune who is the manufacturer of Covishield Vaccine, as per law & ratio laid down inVeena Sippy Vs. Mr. Narayan Dumbre&Ors. 2012 SCC OnLineBom 339; [1]

v) Direct appropriate action by the Respondent No. 3 Union of India against all including main stream and social media like Google, YouTube, facebook etc. who are involved in the conspiracy of suppressing the correct data about death causing and other serious vaccine injuries and spreading false, misleading and one sided data to deprive the citizen to take informed decision and compel them to take vaccines; [1]

vi) Direct the state authorities to take proper steps to stop further deaths of citizen and to publish the side effects of vaccines by following the rules of Universal Declaration on Bioethics & Human Rights, 200and as per law laid down in Master Haridan Kumar Vs. UOI 2019 SCC online Del 11929and also as recently done by the Government of Japan; [1]

vii) Declare that, the Petitioner’s daughter Dr. SnehalLunawat and other doctors as a Martyr who were given Covid vaccines through deception and coercion and who died due to side effects of vaccines. [1]

viii) Open a dedicated research institute in India under the name of Dr. SnehalLunawat. [1]

ix) Pass any other order which this Hon’ble Court maydeems fit and proper in the fact and circumstances of the case.” [1]