Holocaust Survivor on Bhakdi Trial

Re: the Relevance of Prof Bhakdi`s Trial & Alleged Seditious Speech


Back to All Cases

Statement by Irène Tokayer on behalf of Professor Sucharit Bhakdi – May 23 2023

(Translated by CoronaCases from the Rumble Video which can also be seen below)

[text emphasis in bold by CoronaCases]


My name is Irène Tokayer, and I was born in Schwerin, Mecklenburg, in 1927. I am a Survivor of the Holocaust.

In the 1961 film ” Judgment at Nuremberg,” the German judiciary was on trial, represented by the (fictional) law professor and Minister of Justice Janning. The prosecution laid out how the Nazi justice system abused the law against Jews. An underage German girl had been forced to testify falsely that she had been sexually abused by her Jewish landlord, although this was not true. 

Richard Widmark as prosecutor and Spencer Tracy as judge expose this fraud. In the indictment against Sucharit Bhakdi, it is the Chief Public Prosecutor who quite blatantly tries to resurrect a case that had already been shelved, and which seems once again to instrumentalize anti-Semitism politically. This time, anti-Semitism is constructed as an accusation and thus instrumentalized. The accusation is directed against Sucharit Bhakdi, a respected professor of medicine with many significant discoveries and publications to his name.

Before Sucharit Bhakdi talks about what was going on in Israel in 2021 regarding vaccinations (and there are countless voices from Israel confirming it) he actually just invoked the Nuremberg Code (and thus the Nuremberg Trials)! He is lecturing on the legal and moral necessity of fully informed consent, which was ignored and covered up during the worldwide vaccination campaign. A campaign that was promoted and used by individuals and institutions with a proven “eugenic pedigree”. These are circles deeply rooted in Malthusian and Social Darwinist ideology. The Nazis were also convinced of such “doctrines” for humanity, which are not about inalienable rights, but about”proper parentage” and a “contribution to society.”

At 24:08 minutes of that interview from which the prosecutors selected their “soundbites,” Sucharit Bhakdi implores the German government (and all governments) not to force any human being to endure experimental and potentially dangerous injections. First then he spoke about Israel, where the pressure and coercion were indeed much, much higher than almost anywhere else in the world. However, Sucharit Bhakdi was primarily addressing the German public (and those of other German-speaking countries) to heed and bring to bear the lessons of the Nuremberg Trials and the essence of the Nuremberg Code. This deserves applause rather than an indictment! Bhakdi then addresses the speed with which things escalate once prudence is disregarded. This is a reminder of exactly what Marian Turski, president of the Auschwitz Committee, said in January 2020 on the occasion of the 75thanniversary of the liberation of Auschwitz: seemingly harmless events can quickly escalate into “another Auschwitz falling from the sky.” It is the task of society, but above all of the judiciary, to carefully examine the justification of such warnings, if necessary by hearing experts! Nothing of the sort has been done so far. On the contrary, the debate about the well-founded, consistent and conclusive warnings of Professor Bhakdi and his colleagues has been brutely suppressed. Indeed, the charges brought against Professor Bhakdi seem to serve one purpose: to silence a whistleblower by demonizing him as an enemy of the Jewish people.

The court should recall the words of the U.S. President’s Commission on the Holocaust, which declared on September 27, 1979, that “it is always the same enemy” -the enemy of the Jewish people as well as the enemy of humanity! He can be recognized, it is said, by the way he goes about it: this enemy seeks to divide society, old against young (as did the German and other governments who sought to instill in young children the fear of “killing Grandma”). Black against white (as in the global vaccination campaign, where governments first bragged to their constituents about exclusive contracts for “vaccines” -an example of which is precisely Israel -before later touting global equality because Third World countries were supposedly not getting enough vaccines. When in fact many African and Asian peoples did not want the gene shot at all). And also non-Jews vs. Jews are set against each other (as is now attempted to press Professor Bhakdi into this stereotype, when in fact he is concerned with preserving the very conditions that make us human, see 1:25:00 in the interview: Compassion, Love, and Community).

Yes, Professor Bhakdi warns in his speeches against a repeat of the Holocaust! So do I! And so do many other survivors in our documentary “Never Again Is Now Global.” The Chief Public Prosecutor should study closely the “Report to the President” received by Jimmy Carter from Elie Wiesel, an Auschwitz survivor and chairman of the Holocaust Commission on that momentous September 27, 1979. The report was prepared by a high-level commission that included many Holocaust survivors.

Today there are still some of us who survived the camps or escaped the Gestapo. This report refers to them as the “messengers and guardians of the secrets entrusted to them by the dead.” I share the report’s concern, a concern that is obvious to anyone who listens to Sucharit Bhakdi’s interview with an open mind and an open heart:

„Not only has the moral landscape of human reality been altered by the Holocaust, but the acceleration of technology and nuclear power now threaten human existence itself. By focusing on the dangers inherent in the ends and means of a technological, bureaucratic society, study of the Holocaust and its implications can encourage a renewal of commitment to sanity and humanity“ I hope that the German judiciary will finally understand what is at stake -and that the court will have the courage to acquit Sucharit Bhakdi of the perversely constructed charge of being an anti-Semite and trivializing the Holocaust. He is the right man to know that technology has long since acquired the capacity to commit genocide without immediate notice.

However strong the pressure put on prosecutors and judges in Germany today: Let the judiciary be blindfolded, but as judges and as prosecutors you must open your eyes and look. It is there in plain sight!

May 23rd, 2023

Holocaust Survivor Irène Tokayer Defends Bhakdi -May 23 2023

source: Rumble / Alschner.Klartext.


Anti-Semitic, Bhakdi, Commentary, Doctors4CovidEthics, free speech, Genocide, germany, Holocaust, Israel, Kiel, Kiel Public Prosecutor, Lausen, Martin Schwab, Microbiology, Plön, professor, Schleswig-Holstein, Schwab, Sucharit, Tom Lausen, Vera Sharav, Wertinitiative

Back to All Cases




Legal Opinion: PEI Negligence of Duty

Re: the Negligence by the PEI not to investigate the Unusual Death statistics as it is directed to by law


Back to All Cases


This is a summary of the legal opinion of lawyer Frank Großenbach representing data analyst Tom Lausen and the arguments of Martin Sichert (MP) given in a press conference in the Bundestag 12th Dec 2022.

Full (in German) press conference -Dec 12 2022

English subtitled video of M Sichert’s introduction -Dec 12 2022

Link to lawyer Großenbach’s letter to the PEI detailing their obligation under law to investigate unexpected deaths. (in original German and English translation)

The conference concerned itself with results from the analysis of medical diagnostic code data obtained by M Sichert by an FOI requestto the National Association of Statutory Health Insurance Physicians (BVK). This data base covers about 72 million anonymised patient diagnosticrecords from doctor visits in Germany.

Expert Lausen’s analysis clearly showed an alarming deviation (increase) in the numbers of deaths associated with typical indicator codes temporally associated with onset of vaccination with the Covid-19 vaccines. Additionally, increased frequencies of diagnoses of a range of illnesses were observed also in temporal association with onset of vaccinations.

Link to Tom Lausen’s presentation

Legal Opinion:

The opinion of Sichert, Lausen and their lawyer,Großenbach is that the Paul-Ehrlich-Institute is in clear breach of its duty under law to investigate the significant number of unexpected deaths identified by Lausen using the same data available from the BVK.

The Paul Ehrlich Institute has NOT requested this data so far. They have never requested the data that could be obtained by means of a simple Freedom of Information (FOI) request to the National Association of Statutory Health Insurance Physicians. (ref. Tom Lausen presentation slide #24)

Großenbach’s detailed legal argument against the PEI can be found here in his letter (in original German and English translation)

In a German language article published Dec 20, 2022 (English translation here ) The Epoch Times summarised Großenbach’s legal opinion as follows:

Frank Großenbach, a lawyer from Frankfurt, is also of the opinion that there is an “initial suspicion” because of the excess mortality “of at least 30,000 in 2021, the year of the vaccinations”, which is proven by data. This is not only sufficient, but even obligatory, to “withdraw the mRNA active substances from circulation” until it can be “safely excluded” that the excess mortality is due to the vaccinations. According to section 69 of the Medicines Act and due to the legal mandate according to section 13, paragraph 5 of the Infection Protection Act, the occurrence of a “warning signal” is sufficient to immediately withdraw the mRNA active substances from the market. He considers this warning signal to be given after Lausen’s analysis.

At the very least, however, “the population must be informed about the factual connections”, “so that everyone can act in a self-determined manner in their own knowledge of the data on their body”, demanded Großenbach. On 12 December, the day of the AfD press conference, he had already made a statement to the PEI on behalf of Tom Lausen (video at Odysee).

In his estimation, the statements of KBV head Andreas Gassen had even strengthened the position of the vaccination campaign sceptics: “He explains that the presented increased mortality would represent a normal pandemic event. This is a simple assessment of the figures. This assessment is not plausible”. With his statement, Gassen had indirectly “confirmed that the excess mortality determined by Tom Lausen was statistically correct. It is just that his conclusions from the figures presented are different”, explained Großenbach.

Großenbach in his letter to the PEI gave a deadline to respond by Dec 19 2022

If we have not received a statement from you by 12.00 noon on 19 December2022, we must assume that you intend to continue to remain inactive even though the data are now available to you, or if the statement does not make it clear that you are taking appropriate measures, we will immediately report you, the persons addressed in this letter, to the public prosecutor’s office at the Darmstadt Regional Court without further hesitation or waiting, on account of the violation of criminal law associated with the breach of your guarantor status. In order to be able to file a complaint immediately, we will already formulate a complaint now.

Related Articles & Videos
  1. Media report from News24 about the press conference–Dec 12 2022
  2. Media report from ‘The Gateway Pundit’-Dec 13 2022
  3. Article in MOVIE –Dec 15 2022
  4. Corroboration of findings. Another German data analyst, responding to BVK and ZI criticism of Tom Lausen’s findings based on claims that the raw data set was somehow faulty and that no meaningful conclusions can be drawn from it, published this video on Dec 16 2022. In it he broadly agrees with the main findings of Lausen after demonstrating that the data set can be relied upon to extract results which look very plausible.
  5. A US doctor published this article on Dec 13 2022 containing links allowing anyone who cares to check the data set themselves to download it and search on the various diagnostic codes using an excel program provided.
  6. VID: Florida Gov DeSantis Announces Vaccine Grand Jury -Dec 14 2022
  7. VID: Vaccine Injuries in Australia -Dec 6 2022
  8. VID: Vax Victims are ‘Ghosts’ -Dec 7 2022
  9. VID: Prof Fukushima “Stop the Vax – You’re Killing People!” -Nov 29 2022
  10. VID: Science Summit Uncensored: Dutch Excess Mortality Data -Aug 15, 2022
  11. VID: Science Summit Uncensored: 2nd Experiment -Aug 15, 2022
  12. Proposed German Vaccine Mandate
  13. Austrian Doctors Warn of Vaccine Dangers & Un-Informed Consent
  14. Vaccine Crimes: German Lawyer B Bahner’s Legal Opinion on illegal implementation of the vaccines & violation of German & EU Medical Laws Legal Opinion-Bahner-VaxLegality


Article, Bundestag, BVK, Darmstadt Regional Court, Data, Death, Duty, FOI, Gassen, germany, Großenbach, Lausen, Legal Opinion, Mandate, National Association of Statutory Health Insurance Physicians, Negligence, Obligation, Paul Ehrlich Institute, PEI, Sichert, Vaccine, Violation

Back to All Cases




Legal Opinion: Vaccine Mandate

Re: how to respond to the German Government’s proposed Covid Vaccine Mandate


Back to All Cases


German Lawyer B Bahner’s letter of advice to those seeking Legal council against the mandates – Mar 7, 2022


My current response to the many inquiries around the planned general vaccination obligation:

At the moment, I recommend waiting and keeping a cool head. The general vaccination obligation in the form of the presentation of a vaccination certificate has not yet been introduced, there are still no fines, and therefore we cannot react at all. There is only a first draft law that provides for compulsory proof of Corona vaccination for all adults from the age of 18.

The law is not to come into force until 1 October 2022 – and is to expire just over a year later, on 31 December 2023.

However, the bill does not provide for compulsory vaccination, but only for compulsory proof of vaccination – presumably digitalised…. Pregnant women and persons for whom vaccination is contraindicated are exempt from the obligation to provide proof of vaccination.

So no one will be forcibly vaccinated or even taken away by police or soldiers and forced to be vaccinated at gunpoint or against their will.

At most, a fine of a maximum of €2,500 may be imposed.

Here, too, it must be waited and seen whether and how quickly the missing proof will be checked and then sanctioned with a fine at all! In the case of a penalty notice, the competent authority must receive an objection by fax or letter within two weeks, otherwise the fine will become legally binding.

However, if millions of non-vaccinated citizens receive fines and defend themselves against them, then any court dates will probably not be scheduled for many months or even one or two years. Then the question of the constitutionality of compulsory vaccination will have to be fundamentally clarified before the courts.

However, I am sure that no fines will be imposed this year, so it is also a case of waiting and keeping a cool head.

Getting individual advice from me at this stage would therefore be a waste money. Of course, in the event of the introduction of compulsory vaccination (which has not yet been decided!!), many lawyers will take legal action against this and of course there will also be constitutional complaints. So really wait and see and don’t let yourself be frightened.

On 27.12.2021 I prepared a legal opinion on the punishability of the Corona vaccination, you can find it on my homepage. It could be helpful, you are welcome to use it and forward it, like all my documents on my homepage.

In my opinion, the most important thing is close networking with like-minded people and those affected. Together we are strong, only through joint activities can we make a difference. We are much more than we think. So find these people, especially in your local area and in professional and social networks and support each other, unfortunately this is not a sprint but a marathon!

You will find a lot of free information not only in my book “Corona Vaccination: What Doctors and Patients Absolutely Need to Know”, which is also available free of charge as an eBook, but also on my homepage at and on my Telegram channel at

Unfortunately, I cannot provide further free information by email and telephone due to the enormous number of inquiries, for which I am sure you will understand.

Beate Bahner, specialist lawyer for medical law

Author of the book “Corona vaccination: What doctors and patients should absolutely know”.

Member of Lawyers for Enlightenment

My Telegram channel:

My homepage:


Meine aktuelle Antwort zu den vielen Anfragen rund um die geplante allgemeine Impfpflicht:

Im Moment empfehle ich, abzuwarten und einen kühlen Kopf zu bewahren. Noch ist die allgemeine Impfpflicht in Form der Vorlage eines Impfnachweises nicht eingeführt, noch gibt es keine Bußgelder, noch können wir deshalb überhaupt nicht reagieren. Es liegt lediglich ein erster Gesetzentwurf vor, der eine Nachweispflicht der Corona-Impfung für alle Erwachsenen ab 18 Jahren vorsieht.

Das Gesetz soll erst zum 1. Oktober 2022 in Kraft treten – und bereits ein gutes Jahr später, am 31. Dezember 2023 wieder außer Kraft treten.

Der Gesetzentwurf sieht allerdings keine Impfplicht vor, sondern nur eine Nachweispflicht über die Impfung – vermutlich digitalisiert…. Ausgenommen vom Impfnachweis sind Schwangere und Personen, bei denen eine Impfung kontraindiziert ist.

Niemand wird also zwangsgeimpft oder gar von Polizei oder Soldaten abtransportiert und mit Waffengewalt oder gegen seinen Willen Zwang geimpft.

Es droht allenfalls ein Bußgeld in Höhe von maximal 2.500,- €.

Auch hier muss abgewartet werden, ob und wie schnell der fehlende Nachweis überprüft und dann überhaupt mit einem Bußgeld sanktioniert wird! Im Falle eines Bußgeldbescheids muss in jedem Fall binnen zwei Wochen per Fax oder Brief der Einspruch dagegen bei der zuständigen Behörde eingegangen sein, sonst wird das Bußgeld rechtskräftig.

Wenn jedoch Millionen nicht geimpfte Bürger Bußgelder erhalten und sich hiergegen wehren, dann werden etwaige Gerichtstermine vermutlich erst in vielen Monaten oder sogar erst in ein oder zwei Jahren anberaumt. Dann wird die Frage der Verfassungsmäßigkeit der Impfpflicht fundamental vor den Gerichten geklärt werden müssen.

Ich bin jedoch sicher, dass in diesem Jahr keine Bußgelder verhängt werden, es gilt also auch hier, abzuwarten und einen kühlen Kopf zu bewahren.

Eine Beratung durch mich zum jetzigen Zeitpunkt wäre daher unnötiges Geld. Freilich werden darüber hinaus im Falle der Einführung einer Impfpflicht (diese ist derzeit noch nicht beschlossen!!) viele Anwälte hiergegen vorgehen und freilich wird es auch Verfassungsbeschwerden geben. Warten Sie also wirklich ab und lassen Sie sich nicht verängstigen!

Ich habe am 27.12.2021 ein Rechtsgutachten zur Strafbarkeit der Corona-Impfung erstellt, dieses finden Sie auf meiner Homepage. Es könnte hilfreich sein, Sie können es gerne verwenden und weiterleiten, wie alle meine Dokumente auf meiner Homepage.

Das Wichtigste ist nach meiner Einschätzung eine enge Vernetzung mit Gleichgesinnten und Betroffenen. Gemeinsam sind wir stark, nur durch gemeinsame Aktivitäten können wir etwas bewirken. Wir sind viel mehr, als wir denken! Also finden Sie diese Menschen, vor allem bei sich vor Ort und in beruflichen und sozialen Netzwerken und unterstützen Sie sich gegenseitig, dies hier ist leider kein Sprint, sondern ein Marathon!

Viele kostenlose Infos finden Sie nicht nur in meinem Buch „Corona-Impfung: Was Ärzte und Patienten unbedingt wissen sollten“, das auch kostenlos als EBook erhältlich ist, sondern auch auf meiner Homepage unter und auf meinen Telegramkanal unter

Weitere kostenlose Auskünfte per Email und Telefon kann ich leider aufgrund der enormen Anzahl von Anfragen nicht erteilen, wofür Sie sicherlich Verständnis haben.

Beate Bahner, Fachanwältin für Medizinrecht

Autorin des Buches “Corona-Impfung: Was Ärzte und Patienten unbedingt wissen sollten”

Mitglied der Anwälte für Aufklärung

Mein Telegramkanal:

Meine Homepage:


related articles
  1. Vaccine Crimes: German Lawyer B Bahner’s Legal Opinion on illegal implementation of the vaccines & violation of German & EU Medical Laws Legal Opinion-Bahner-VaxLegality
  2. Proposed German Vaccine Mandate


article, Berliner Zeitung, BKK, CEO, deaths, evaluation, germany, Insurance, Letter, Paul Ehrlich Institute, PEI, Petition, ProVita, risks, Schöfbeck, side effects, underreporting, Vaccination, Vaccine

Back to All Cases