Health Minister Complaint Case
Re: the Legality of a Health Minister knowingly distributing False Information about a new Pharmacological Product regarding its safety & efficacy
Facts of the Case
- Dates: Jan 16, 2023
- Location: Berlin, Germany
- Court: State Prosecutor /Staatsanwaltschaft Berlin
- Case #: TBD
- Plaintiff: Wilfried Schmitz
- Plaintiff’s Lawyer: Wilfried Schmitz
- Defendant: Health Minister Karl Lauterbach & others in Federal Health Ministry
- Trial Type: Criminal Complaint
- Judge: TBD
- Status: complaint submitted
- Verdict: TBD
*updated Jan 31, 2023
This is a legal complaint  formulated and submitted by lawyer Wilfried Schmitz against:
Prof. Dr. Karl Lauterbach, Federal Minister of Health and all other employees of the Federal Ministry of Health who may still be involved in the crime. 
on suspicion of:
dangerous and grievous bodily harm (in office) resulting in death according to §§ 223, 224, 226, 227, 340 StGB,
manslaughter and murder according to §§ 212 and 211 StGB,
negligent bodily injury according to § 229 StGB,
involuntary manslaughter according to § 222 StGB,
all possible criminal offences according to §§ 95, 96 AMG,
all other possible criminal offences and forms of participation under the Criminal Code, the War Weapons Control Act, the International Criminal Code.
In essence, this complaint arose from action taken by German Dr. Weikl, vice chairman of Medical Workers and Scientists for Health, Freedom and Democracy (MWGFD), following his interest in a similar complaint against the Swiss president Alain Berset (1). He then began to analyse the legal situation in Germany to establish whether a similar action could conceivably be taken against Federal Health Minister Karl Lauterbach :
The ball was set rolling by an interview by Dr. Ronald Weikl with the Swiss investment banker Pascal Najadi. The Vice of the Medical Workers and Scientists for Health, Freedom and Democracy (MWGFD) spoke with Najadi about his criminal charges against Federal Councillor Alain Berset, whose responsibilities in Bern include the Health Department. As a triple-vaccinated man, the banker feels he has been hoodwinked by Berset and his “false allegations on the Corona issue”.
The aspect of Swiss law used in the complaint against Alain Berset is not directly applicable in Germany: 
Unlike the Swiss Penal Code, the German equivalent does not know the offence of abuse of office in this form. A lawyer who was not named in the MWGFD press release therefore recommended to Dr. Weikl: “The only law that could be invoked is the Heilmittelwerbegesetz (HWG), which requires truthful information […] Or, in the interplay of the Infektionsschutzgesetz (IfSG) and the obligation to vaccinate (or the obligation to tolerate, as in the case of members of the armed forces, for example), possibly the offence of ‘coercion in office’ Paragraph 240….”.
The lawyer Wilfried Schmitz, however, saw in this statement: 
a “grossly false” and “extremely trivialising representation” and felt it was clearly “too lax”, which is why he addressed Dr. Weikl directly with an email in which he wrote: 
“…If a health minister deceives the entire public, in particular by deliberately misstating that Covid-19 injections are ‘free of side effects’, contrary to his legal duties, then the most serious criminal offences such as murder must also be examined here, in particular (i.e. not only) the murder characteristic of insidiousness. Furthermore, criminal offences under the AMG (Medicines Act): Finally, in this context, at least (!) the aiding and abetting of the serious criminal offences of third parties, which were supported or made possible by such public false allegations, would have to be examined. His statement that the Covid-19 injections were also ‘highly effective’ was – as has long been proven – of course also deliberately false. But with the lie of no side effects, it is even easier to prove. For your information, I am enclosing my criminal complaint against those responsible at the PEI, etc. I assume that your association will inform visitors to its homepage more accurately in future. For you should not give the impression of wanting to divert attention from the true criminal guilt of those primarily responsible for the administration of the Covid-19 injections. A half-truth that distracts from the whole truth is a whole lie!“
Lawyer Wilfried Schmitz formulated & submitted the complaint against Lauterbach .
First Corona Case in Germany accusing a Health Minister of criminal intent to cause harm
To justify his accusations, the lawyer first refers to a Youtube video in which several experts comment on a complaint filed in Switzerland against Swissmedic and explain the context from a professional point of view.  
For an introduction to the facts that gave rise to this criminal complaint, I recommend the YouTube video entitled “Media conference: Criminal complaint against Swissmedic”, available under the link
From this video you will already be able to gather a whole series of highly qualified experts who would certainly not refuse to give expert advice to your authority, in particular:
- Dr. Michael Palmer on the special mode of action of mRNA injections,
- Prof. Dr. Andreas Sönnichsen on the (lack of) effectiveness of these injections,
- Prof. Dr. Dr. Martin Haditsch on the risks of mRNA injections,
- Prof. Dr. Konstantin Beck on the risk to public health from these Covid 19 injections (excess mortality etc.).
Lawyer Schmitz goes on to argue: 
the full text of the criminal complaint filed by the Swiss lawyers Kruse Law on 14.7.2022, which will adequately inform you that and – at the latest – from when and why (also) the responsible persons of the PEI and thus the defendants here had to be positively aware that these Covid-19 injections are questionable medicinal products in the sense of § 5 AMG, so that they were obliged by virtue of their legal competence to prevent these medicinal products – ever and further – from entering the market and being used on humans.
The prerequisites for a conditional authorisation never existed, and this was evident from the very beginning, so that from a point in time yet to be determined, the defendants would also have been aware of it.
You will certainly remember that the accused Federal Minister of Health, Prof. Dr. Karl Lauterbach, never tired of publicly emphasising at every possible opportunity that the Covid-19 vaccines were very or highly effective and, in particular, “free of side effects”.
He of all people had to know better from the very beginning, so that his misleading statements in any case already justify criminal liability according to § 95 para. 1 nos. 1 and 3 a AMG.
…More information is needed…
Relevant Prior Judgements/ Cases
…More information is needed…
…More information is needed…
In the news:
source: Odysee/ longXXvids
source: Odysee/ yabba
- Corona Cases: Presidential Crimes Case
- link to translation of Reitschuster article on the case
- Original Criminal Complaint Document (Deutsch)
- Corona Cases: mRNA Injury Case
Beck, Berlin, Criminal Complaint, Germany, Haditsch, Health Minister, Injections, Karl Lauterbach, lauterbach, mRNA, Palmer, Sönnichsen, Swissmedic, Switzerland, Wilfried Schmitz