Swissmedic mRNA Injury Case

Swissmedic mRNA Injury Case

mRNA Injury Case

Re: The Legality of 1) Authorisation of Covid Vaccines by Swissmedic & 2) Vaccination by Swiss doctors of substances for which Safety was Unknown

 

Back to All Cases

Facts of the Case

  • Dates: July 14, 2022 (filed)
  • Location: Switzerland
  • Court: TBD
  • Case #: TBD
  • Plaintiff: 6 Injection Victims
  • Plaintiff’s Lawyer: Philipp Kruse
  • Defendant: 3 individuals at Swissmedic, 5 vaccinating doctors at Univ. Hospital Bern
  • Trial Type: criminal complaint
  • Judge: TBD
  • Status: Ongoing
  • Verdict: TBD


*updated Nov 16, 2022

 

Background

This case involves a criminal complaint made by Swiss lawyer Philipp Kruse on behalf of six people who were injured after taking the m-RNA vaccines. Kruse and his colleagues are not only initiating an action against the drugs regulator, Swissmedic but also against doctors who vaccinated these people knowing that the products were not properly tested.

The complaint was filed in July 2022 and the public announcement of this case made on Nov 14 2022 with a press conference held that same day. At the conference Kruse was supported by 3 vaccine victims telling their stories, 5 medical experts and 2 other lawyers, one of these being a former cantonal public prosecutor.

 

Significance

This case may be the first in Europe to be prosecuted relating to the Covid injections and where a national medicines regulator stands accused of criminal negligence in allowing products to be marketed which are demonstrably causing injuries and deaths on a massive scale.

 

Plaintiff’s Argument

Against Swissmedic

Lawyer Kruse states (1,2):

37 complainants and six private claimants directly harmed by mRNA «vaccinations» (all of whom are specified in the recitals) are filing the present criminal claim to protect their own health and out of legitimate concern for the health of their fellow human beings.

What we are dealing with here is the greatest threat to human health caused by medicinal products and the greatest injury to human health that Switzerland has ever seen: The authorization and administration of the largely ineffective mRNA «vaccines» represent a far greater danger than the SARS-CoV-2 pathogen against which these «vaccines» are supposed to provide protection.

Swissmedic is primarily responsible for this threat: By law, it has the central function of protecting the health of the Swiss population. To this end, it must ensure, on the one hand, that only high quality, safe, and effective therapeutic products are placed on the market. On the other hand, it must protect consumers of therapeutic products against fraud (Art. 1 TPA). The notifying parties acting on behalf of Swissmedic failed to comply with these guarantee obligations on several occasions and to a significant extent, which is why they have been under strong suspicion, since December 2020 and up to the present day,

• of having repeatedly violated the due diligence obligations under therapeutic product law (Art. 86(1a) TPA, in conjunction with. Art. 3 TPA [general due diligence] and Art. 7 TPA [due diligence requirement of the manufacturer]) in the course of marketing authorization and batch testing which, according to federal court rulings, is deemed to be manufacturing, in that

• they granted «temporary» authorization for the mRNA «vaccines» within the meaning of Art. 9a TPA despite the lack of sufficient evidence of efficacy and safety and despite massive risk signals,

• they massively undercut the already very low safety precautions that are decisive for the procedure according to Art. 9a TPA and have thus created risks for public health that had never been posed by a medicinal product before,

• they not only permanently withheld elementary information on the minimal to complete lack of protective effect of the mRNA «vaccines» and the actual risk of side effects from the population and the medical community, but also systematically conveyed this information in a misleading manner,

  • • of not having fulfilled the duty of post-marketing surveillance (so-called «pharmacovigi-lance») in a risk-adequate manner, but rather having permanently violated the obligation to notify under therapeutic product law (Art. 87(1c) TPA) in a serious manner,

  • • of having seriously violated the prohibition on the advertising of therapeutic products (Art. 87(1b) TPA),

  • • of having satisfied the corresponding elements of an offense under the Criminal Code when death/ bodily injury has occurred.

  • • On December 19, 2020, Swissmedic announced the following regarding the authorization of Comirnaty:

«This represents the world’s first authorization in the ordinary proce-dure».

This statement is simply false and represents a misleading lie, which many people still mistakenly believe to be true to this day – after all, this announcement can still be viewed on the Swissmedic homepage.

 

  • • In the information for healthcare professionals for Comirnaty, Swissmedic published in December 2020 that «no vaccine-related effects on female fertility, pregnancy, embryo-fetal development, or the development of offspring have been observed». This is in stark contrast to study results and warnings from the manufacturer and expert committees, which were available to Swissmedic.

  • • At the end of 2020, Swissmedic had already posted on its own website an «FAQ» ad-dressed to the public, which contained countless misleading details that Swissmedic could have recognized as clear misinformation based on the data already available in-ternally at the end of 2020.

  • …..

  • According to the information provided above, Swissmedic has approved a highly experimental and dangerous medicinal product against a disease that posed and poses no greater threat to the general population than influenza. As a last «lifeline», Swissmedic would have to prove that the somewhat higher-risk target population of elderly people and those with pre-existing illnesses would have been at least somewhat effectively protected against SARS-CoV-2. However, this is also absolutely not the case. The «vaccination» obviously fails to achieve the necessary «large-scale» efficacy:

  • As a result, this «temporary» authorization in the sense of Art. 9a, TPA means nothing more than the fact that the entire Swiss population unknowingly participated and continues to participate in the largest clinical experiment ever conducted in Switzerland (and indeed the world).

 
Against vaccinating physicians at the “Insel Group” Hospital
  • The breaches of due diligence obligations complained of here essentially consist in the fact that the notifying parties acting on behalf of Swissmedic (and, in principle, also the notified physicians) were already aware of countless risk factors from December 2020 onwards, each of which, when assessed in isolation, would have prevented the granting of the «tem-porary» authorization (and the administration of the corresponding mRNA injections) until the corresponding risk factors had been clarified in detail and eliminated under normal cir-cumstances. …

  • If the “Insel Group” has used COVID “vaccines” on humans in breach of the duty of care under the law on therapeutic products, has reported side effects to Swissmedic in an in-adequate manner and if the “Insel Group” has endangered or already injured the health of a large number of people in the careless use of the mRNA “vaccines”, the offences of defendants 4-8 in this regard are deemed to have been committed in 3010 Bern and/or at Friedbühlstrasse 15 in 3008 Bern (location of the Inselspital vaccination centre).

 

 

Defendant’s Argument

…More information is needed…

 

Relevant Prior Judgements/ Cases

…More information is needed…

 

Decision

 

Media


Press Conference -Nov 14, 2022

source: Odysee/ longXXvids


Swiss Vaccine Victim #1

source: unerwuenscht.ch


Swiss Vaccine Victim #2

source: unerwuenscht.ch


Science Summit Uncensored: Dutch Excess Mortality Data -Aug 15, 2022

source: Odysee/ shortXXvids


Philipp Kruse speaking at rally in Bern -June 16 2022

source: Odysee/ longXXvids


Philipp Kruse Appeal to the Swiss Public -June 7 2022   

source: Odysee/ shortXXvids

 

References

  1. Criminal complaint (300 pages) in original German and (translated) English, French, Italian languages   

  2. Criminal complaint Summary (10 pages) – 4 languages


 

Keyword

Adverse, Criminal Complaint, Criminal Negligence, Homicide, Injury, Kruse, mRNA, mRNA Vaccine, Negligent Homicide, Philipp Kruse, Side Effects, Swissmedic, Switzerland, Vaccinating doctors, Vaccine Deaths, Vaccine Injury, Vaccine Victims


Back to All Cases

 

Gates Vaccine Murder Case 2

Gates Vaccine Murder Case 2

Gates Vaccine Murder Case 2

Re: the culpability of Bill Gates & partners in the death of a Woman that died as a result of taking their product (the AstraZeneca Covid vaccine), an experimental drug that promised to save lives.

 

Back to All Cases

Facts of the Case

  • Dates: Aug , 2021
  • Location: Bombay, India
  • Court: Bombay High Court
  • Case #: Writ Petition No. 5767 of 2022
  • No. 5767 of 2022
  • Plaintiff: Dilip Lunwat (Petitioner)
  • Plaintiff’s Lawyer: Dipali Ohja
  • Defendant: Bill Gates, Adar Poonawalla, The Indian State
  • Trial Type: Writ petition
  • Justices: Sarang Kotwal & Nitin Jamdar
  • Status: TBD
  • Verdict: TBD

*This case was edited & reviewed by the Lawyer Dipali Ohja

*Updated Nov 12, 2022

 

Background

In October 2021,  India’s National Adverse Event Following Immunisation (“AEFI”) committee acknowledged, almost seven months after her death, that the death of Dr. Snehal Lunawat, a 33- year-old doctor from Maharashtra working in Gurugram, was due a Covishield “vaccine.” At the time, Dr. Lunawat’s death was recognised as the third vaccine-induced death by AEFI. [2]

Dr. Lunawat was compelled to take the “vaccine” on 28 January 2021 as she came under the category of health worker. Eight days later, she developed a severe headache and vomiting and was rushed to a hospital where doctors found bleeding in her brain. She died on 1 March 2021. [2]

On 31 January 2022, the deceased doctor’s father, Dilip Lunwat, filed an Rs.10,000 crores or Rs.100,000,000,000 (US$1.34 billion) claim for compensation in the Indian High Court against the State Government of Maharashtra and Adar Poonawalla and his partner Bill Gates. [2]

On 1 September 2022, the Indian Bar Association reported that the Bombay High Court had “issued notice in a vaccine murder case of Dr. Snehal Lunawat where interim compensation of Rs. 1,000 crores (US$126 million approx.) is sought.”  The notice was issued on 26 August. The 8 defendants in the case are: [2]

  • Serum Institute’s CEO Adar Poonawalla
  • Bill Gates– Partner in the Covishield vaccine
  • Union of India
  • State of Maharashtra
  • Ministry of Health & Family Welfare
  • Drug Controller General of India
  • Dr. V.G. Somani – Drug Controller General
  • Dr. Randeep Guleria, Former Director of AIIMS

Petition also calls for action against social media like Facebook, YouTube, Google and main stream media who are running false narrative & conspiracy theories that vaccines are completely safe and are suppressing the news and information regarding side effects,inefficacy or failure of vaccines. [1]

The case has been scheduled for hearing on 17 November 2022. [2]

 
Petitioner’s Statement

The Father, Mr. Lunawat has stated in his plea that health workers like his daughter were compelled to take vaccine due to the false narratives created by Drug Controller General of India (DCGI) and Director of All India Institute of Medical Science (AIIMS) that vaccines are safe, a narrative which was endorsed by State authorities as well, without verification. [1]

He stated that his daughter took the vaccine on January 28, 2021 and due to the side effects of the vaccine, she passed away on March 1, 2021. [1]

Pertinently, Mr. Lunawat contended that the Central government’s AEFI committee on October 2, 2021 admitted that the death of his daughter was due to side effects of Covishield vaccine. [1]

“This petition is being filed to give justice to my daughter and in order to save the life of many more people who are likely to be murdered due to such unlawful activities of Respondent authorities,” the plea stated [1]

 
Covishield is the Oxford-AstraZeneca vaccine made by the Serum Institute of India.  [2]

The Oxford-AstraZeneca vaccine has been suspended or has had its use limited in many countries, in some cases temporarily, over safety and efficacy issues. See Wikipedia ‘Oxford–AstraZeneca Covid-19 vaccine’.  Bill Gates funded the efforts in manufacturing the Covishield “vaccine.”  As a report by The Hindustan Times in August 2020 indicated, Gates had big dreams for Covishield: [2]

The Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation, via its Strategic Investment Fund, will provide at-risk funding of USD 150 million to Gavi, which will then be utilized to support the Serum Institute to manufacture the potential vaccine candidate. The potential Covid-19 vaccine manufactured by SII is likely to be made available to at least 92 countries. [2]

Serum Institute ties up with Bill Gates Foundation, Gavi to speed up Covid-19 vaccine manufacture process, The Hindustan Times, 7 August 2020

Due to deaths caused by covishield a.k.a Astrazeneca globally, around 18 European Countries have banned these vaccines. [1]

Link:https://www.aljazeera.com/news/2021/3/15/which-countries-have-halted-use-of-astrazenecas-covid-vaccine

 

worldwide cases of compensation claims by victims of side effects of Corona Vaccine:-

 

Significance

This case is the world’s first vaccine murder case to get a hearing against Bill Gates and his Indian partner, Adar Poonawalla, CEO of the Serum Institute of India. The significance depending on the outcome could be scandalous for the pharmaceutical industry

 

Related Prior Judgements/ Cases

  • The first petition for vaccine murder was filed before the Bombay High court by Smt. Kiran Yadav for claiming compensation of Rs. 100 crores($ 12.6 million approx.) for death of her son Hitesh Kadve. She has also sought criminal prosecution of Bill Gates & others. This case was widely discussed across the globe due to the serious side effects of covishield. (Smt. Kiran Yadav vs. The State of Maharashtra &Ors. Cri. WP No. 6159 of 2021) [1]

    Link:-https://childrenshealthdefense.org/defender/bill-gates-indian-government-lawsuit-astrazeneca-vaccine-killed-shri-hitesh-kadve/

  • In December 2021, in an unrelated case, India’s Central Government told the Supreme Court in its affidavit that there was no immunity for vaccine companies.  The Indian Bar Association noted: [2]

It is a major setback to the toxic philanthropist and vaccine mafia’s Kingpin Bill Gates and his partner Adar Poonawalla, and other co-accused who have been prosecuted for mass murders through vaccines. They are also charged for offences of cheating public at large with false narratives and conspiracy theories. [2]

More Trouble for Bill Gates and Adar Poonawalla, Indian Bar Association, 3 December 2021

News link :  https://www.livelaw.in/news-updates/19-year-old-dies-post-covishield-vaccination-kerala-high-court-seeks-centres-response-on-parents-plea-196742?infinitescroll=1

  • On 10.08.2022, Kerala High Court in the case of Sayeeda Vs Union of India in WP (C) No. 17628 of 2022 has issued directions to the Central Government to immediately formulate guidelines for giving compensation to the victims of deaths or other side effects of vaccines. [1]

Order Link: https://drive.google.com/file/d/1APHixFHhQTGXwzc29CS2g5V7y1Z_-IUH/view?usp=sharing

  • On August 10 2022, the central government submitted before Kerala High Court that they are in process of formulating policies to provide monetary compensation to victims of side effects of these vaccines. [1]

The matter came before Kerala High Court. The Court observed; [1]

This is a national calamity which we faced. Of course, I do understand the case is very genuine and it has to be dealt with. As far as the Central government is concerned, similar issues are cropping up in other states also. There has to be an effort to formulate a proper guideline, a proper scheme for compensating these persons and that is being done. Let them bring on record what steps have been taken so that I can pass a reasoned and considered order, rather than an order in vacuum. It is not a laughing matter, I consider it to be very serious“, he orally observed.” [1]

The Court acknowledged the seriousness of the petitioners’ submission that the process has to be hastened since the family members of the victims are facing extreme difficulties consequent to the death of the earning member of the family. [1]

I find the apprehension expressed by the learned counsel to be well founded. The situation requires urgent action on the part of the National Disaster Management Authority“, the Court said in its order.”. [1]

Largest Health Care Fraud Settlement in U.S. History

Between 2001 and 2007, GSK failed to include certain safety data about Avandia,  a diabetes drug. [1]

GSK has agreed to pay $657 million relating to false claims arising from misrepresentations about Avandia. The federal share of this settlement is $508 million and the state share is $149 million. [1]

GSK has agreed to plead guilty to failing to report data to the FDA and has agreed to pay a criminal fine in the amount of $242,612,800 for its unlawful conduct concerning Avandia. [1]

It also includes allegations that GSK paid kickbacks to health care professionals to induce them to promote and prescribe these drugs as well as the drugs Imitrex, Lotronex, Flovent and Valtrex. The United States alleges that this conduct caused false claims to be submitted to federal health care programs. [1]

GSK has agreed to pay $1.043 billion relating to false claims arising from this alleged conduct. The federal share of this settlement is $832 million and the state share is $210 million.” [1]

 

Plaintiff’s Argument

i) To hold that, the petitioner’s daughter was given vaccine under deception, and false narratives by the state authorities that the vaccines are completely safe and if any serious or severe side effects occurs then the state authorities have define treatment, however when she suffered serious side effects then there was no treatment available and lastly she died due to side effects of vaccines as has been confirmed by the Government of India’s AEFI Committee, therefore state authorities are responsible for causing her death by spreading false narratives and therefore, they are bound to compensate the petitioner in view of law laid by Hon’ble Supreme Court and Hon’ble High Courts and more particularly in the case of Registrar General, High Court of Meghalaya Vs. State of Meghalaya 2021 SCC OnLineMegh 130; [1]

 ii)To hold that the respondent state authorities are having callous criminal attitude as till date they have not changed their frequently asked questions and even on 12.2021 they are continuing their false narratives that they are having definite treatment for any side effects of vaccines; [1]

 iii) To hold that as per law laid down by the Constitution Bench of Hon’ble Supreme Court in Anita Khushwha’s case (2016) 8 SCC 509, the value of life of Indian citizen is not less than that of any person across the world either of America or of any country and therefore the Petitioner is entitled to the compensation in proportion to the compensation granted in other similar cases in United State, Singapore etc. [1]

 iv) To hold that, in view of factual and legal position mentioned in the petition, the petitioner is entitled for an interim compensation of Rs. 1000 Crores as a deterrence to guilty and as succor to petitioner’s family for loss of life of petitioner’s daughter due to deliberate act of commission and omission on the part of respondents, with a liberty to the state authorities to recover it from the responsible officials and Serum Institute, Pune who is the manufacturer of Covishield Vaccine, as per law & ratio laid down inVeena Sippy Vs. Mr. Narayan Dumbre&Ors. 2012 SCC OnLineBom 339; [1]

 v) Direct appropriate action by the Respondent No. 3 Union of India against all including main stream and social media like Google, YouTube, facebook etc. who are involved in the conspiracy of suppressing the correct data about death causing and other serious vaccine injuries and spreading false, misleading and one sided data to deprive  the citizen to take informed decision and compel them to take vaccines; [1]

vi) Direct the state authorities to take proper steps to stop further deaths of citizen and to publish the side effects of vaccines by following the rules of Universal Declaration on Bioethics & Human Rights, 200and as per law laid down in Master Haridan Kumar Vs. UOI 2019 SCC online Del 11929and also as recently done by the Government of Japan; [1]

vii) Declare that, the Petitioner’s daughter Dr. SnehalLunawat and other doctors as a Martyr who were given Covid vaccines through deception and coercion and who died due to side effects of vaccines. [1]

viii) Open a dedicated research institute in India under the name of Dr. SnehalLunawat. [1]

ix) Pass any other order which this Hon’ble Court maydeems fit and proper in the fact and circumstances of the case.” [1]

 

Defendant’s Argument

tbd

 

Decision

tbd

M Steyn talks to Widows of Vaccine Victims -May 5 2022

source: odysee\ longXXvids

Pfizer Scandal “At the Speed of Science” -Oct 12 2022

source: Odysee/ shortXXvids

EU MEP Rob Roos Pfizer Admits Jab not Tested for Transmission -Oct 11 2022

source: Odysee/ shortXXvids


Science Summit Uncensored: Dutch Excess Mortality Data -Aug 15, 2022

source: Odysee/shortXXvids


Scottish Govt “Repeat Experiments” Show Vaccine Harm Causality

source: Odysee/shortXXvids


Gates admits to Low Covid Fatality Rate -June 20222

source: Ivor Cummins


US Army Doctor Whistleblower on Vaccine Deaths -Apr 13, 2022

source: Odysee/shortXXvids


“We’re Coming For You!”: Aussi Sen Roberts on Vaccine Crimes

source: Odysee\Kenan SonofEnos


12 yr old Vaccine Trial Victim, Maddie

source: UK Column News

 

References

  1. Bill Gates’ & Adar Poonawalla’s Game Over
  2. India: Court Date Set for Bill Gates to Answer to Victims’ Family for Daughter’s Murder by Vaccine

 

Keyword

Vaccine induced death, mRNA vaccine, Covishield, vaccine, Dipali Ohja, India, Bill Gates, Adar Poonawalla, vaccine misinformation, Indian High Court, GlaxoSmithKline, Serum Institute of India, Snehal Lunawat, Writ petition, Hitesh Kadwe, murder


Back to All Cases

 

Gates Vaccine Murder Case

Gates Vaccine Murder Case

Gates Vaccine Murder Case

Re: the culpability of Bill Gates & partners in the death of a man that died as a result of taking their product (the AstraZeneca Covid vaccine), an experimental drug that promised to save lives.

 

Back to All Cases

Facts of the Case

  • Dates: Nov 25, 2021
  • Location: Bombay, India
  • Court: Bombay High Court
  • Case #: Criminal Writ Petition (St.) 18017 of 2021
  • Plaintiff: Kiran Yadav (Petitioner)
  • Plaintiff’s Lawyer: Dipali Ohja
  • Defendant: Bill Gates, Adar Poonawalla, The Indian State
  • Trial Type: Writ petition
  • Justices: Sarang Kotwal & Nitin Jamdar
  • Status: TBD
  • Verdict: TBD

*This case was edited & reviewed by the Lawyer Dipali Ohja

*Updated Nov 12, 2022

 

Background

According to advocate Dipali Ohja….. “The plaintiff (petitioner), Kiran Yadav (mother of deceased) has sought prosecution of AstraZeneca’s (Covishield) manufacturer Bill Gates, his partner Adar Poonawalla and other Government officials and political leaders involved in the murder of a 23 year old man, Hitesh Kadwe, who lost his life because of vaccination. The deceased took the Covishield vaccine believing in the false narrative that the vaccine is completely safe and also owing to the compliance requirement set by the Indian Railways that only double vaccinated people would be allowed to travel.”  (1)

This is a Writ Petition for direction of Investigation through premier investigation agency C.B.I. AND granting  interim compensation of Rs. 100 Crores ($ 13.4 million USD)

As of Nov 11, 2022, There seems to be no further news on this case as yet. [2]

 
Covishield is the Oxford-AstraZeneca vaccine made by the Serum Institute of India.  [2]

The Oxford-AstraZeneca vaccine has been suspended or has had its use limited in many countries, in some cases temporarily, over safety and efficacy issues. See Wikipedia ‘Oxford–AstraZeneca Covid-19 vaccine’.  Bill Gates funded the efforts in manufacturing the Covishield “vaccine.”  As a report by The Hindustan Times in August 2020 indicated, Gates had big dreams for Covishield: [2]

The Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation, via its Strategic Investment Fund, will provide at-risk funding of USD 150 million to Gavi, which will then be utilized to support the Serum Institute to manufacture the potential vaccine candidate. The potential Covid-19 vaccine manufactured by SII is likely to be made available to at least 92 countries. [2]

Serum Institute ties up with Bill Gates Foundation, Gavi to speed up Covid-19 vaccine manufacture process, The Hindustan Times, 7 August 2020

 
Another Death & Trial

In October 2021, the month before the first murder case was filed, India’s National Adverse Event Following Immunisation (“AEFI”) committee acknowledged, almost seven months after her death, that the death of Dr. Snehal Lunawat, a 33- year-old doctor from Maharashtra working in Gurugram, was due a Covishield “vaccine.” At the time, Dr. Lunawat’s death was recognised as the third vaccine-induced death by AEFI.

On 31 January 2022, the deceased doctor’s father, Dilip Lunwat, filed an Rs.10,000 crores or Rs.100,000,000,000 (US$1.34 billion) claim for compensation in the Indian High Court against the State Government of Maharashtra and Adar Poonawalla and his partner Bill Gates. 

On 1 September 2022, the Indian Bar Association reported that the Bombay High Court had “issued notice in a vaccine murder case of Dr. Snehal Lunawat where interim compensation of Rs. 1,000 crores (US$126 million approx.) is sought.”  The notice was issued on 26 August. The 8 defendants in the case are:

  • Serum Institute’s CEO Adar Poonawalla
  • Bill Gates– Partner in the Covishield vaccine
  • Union of India
  • State of Maharashtra
  • Ministry of Health & Family Welfare
  • Drug Controller General of India
  • Dr. V.G. Somani – Drug Controller General
  • Dr. Randeep Guleria, Former Director of AIIMS

The case has been scheduled for hearing on 17 November 2022.

 

Significance

This case is the world’s first vaccine murder case against Bill Gates and his Indian partner, Adar Poonawalla, CEO of the Serum Institute of India.

 

Related Prior Judgements/ Cases

  • In December 2021, in an unrelated case, India’s Central Government told the Supreme Court in its affidavit that there was no immunity for vaccine companies.  The Indian Bar Association noted: [2]

It is a major setback to the toxic philanthropist and vaccine mafia’s Kingpin Bill Gates and his partner Adar Poonawalla, and other co-accused who have been prosecuted for mass murders through vaccines. They are also charged for offences of cheating public at large with false narratives and conspiracy theories. [2]

More Trouble for Bill Gates and Adar Poonawalla, Indian Bar Association, 3 December 2021

 
  • The Plaintiff also relied upon the criminal antecedents of Bill Gates in killing 8 female children by unauthorized trial of HPV vaccines in India and judgment of Constitution Bench of the Supreme Court in Kalpana Mehta’s Case (2018) 7 SCC 1, which is a strong proof against Bill Gates and his vaccine syndicate. (1)
  • In a case before the American Court regarding the side effects of MR vaccines, the Court accepted the settlement of compensation of 101 Million US Dollars (around Rs. 752 Crores) to the victim. (1)
  • In another case in America, the CIA, FDA’s office of criminal investigation, recovered around 10.2 Billion US Dollar (around Rs.76,00 crores) from Pharma Company GlaxoSmithKline for various offences including suppression of side effects of the medicines and putting the life of Americans in danger. (1)

 

Plaintiff’s Argument

  • The Government of India’s AEFI (Adverse Event Following Immunisation) Committee has recently admitted that the death of another deceased Dr. Snehal Lunawat, was due to side effects of the Covishield vaccine. [copy of AEFI certificate is annexed to the petition] The said report has exposed the falsity of the claim made by vaccine syndicate that vaccines are totally safe. (1)

  • Plaintiff has claimed Rs. 1000 crores ($ 134 million USD) compensation and has asked for interim compensation of Rs. 100 crores ($ 13.4 million USD). (1)
  • Plaintiff has also sought Lie Detector, Narco Analysis Test of accused Bill Gates and others. (1)
  • Petitioner has also referred to the proofs of sinister plan of Bill Gates in the polio vaccination programme which spoiled the lives of more than 4.5 Lakh children in India as they suffered a new type of paralysis. This is also an additional proof of Bill Gates’ perverted and criminal mindset. The Plaintiff also relied upon the criminal antecedents of Bill Gates in killing 8 female children by unauthorized trial of HPV vaccines in India. (1)

  • As per experts, there is no chance of Bill Gates getting bail in the case and all the movable and immovable properties of the accused will be confiscated soon. (1)
  • Various social organizations and common people have decided to exercise citizen’s right to arrest the accused as provided under section 43 of Cr.P.C. As per the said section, any citizen can arrest Bill Gates, Adar Poonawalla and other accused and handover them to the police. (1)

 

Defendant’s Argument

tbd

 

Decision

tbd

RFKjr on Bill Gates

source: Naomi Wolf

Bill Gates India Vaccine Program

source: Reality Check w Ben Swann

Bill Gates Conflict of Interest

source: shortXXvids

Gates, GAVI & WHO

source: theHighWire.com

Corruption in WHO/GAVI

source: Corona-Ausschuss

Meet Bill Gates

source: the Corbett Report

 

References

  1. https://indianbarassociation.in/worlds-first-vaccine-murder-case-against-bill-gates-adar-poonawalla-filed-in-indias-high-court/
  2. India: Court Date Set for Bill Gates to Answer to Victims’ Family for Daughter’s Murder by Vaccine


 

Keyword

Vaccine induced death, mRNA vaccine, Covishield, vaccine, Dipali Ohja, India, Bill Gates, Adar Poonawalla, vaccine misinformation, Indian High Court, GlaxoSmithKline, Serum Institute of India, Snehal Lunawat, Writ petition, Hitesh Kadwe, murder


Back to All Cases